Internal versus top-down monitoring in community resource management: Experimental evidence from Ethiopia

Goytom Abraha Kahsay, Erwin Bulte*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The evidence on the effectiveness of participatory development approaches in low-income countries is ambiguous. We randomly vary governance modalities to study elite capture in Ethiopian forest user groups and explore implications for livelihoods of group members. Top-down monitoring and punishment increases consumption and income, and decreases inequality. In contrast, internal monitoring has no effect on livelihoods. Additional heterogeneity analysis, based on observational data, reveals that while top-down monitoring works in groups where forest benefits are unimportant, internal monitoring improves economic outcomes in those groups where forest benefits are an important component of rural livelihoods. This suggests that participatory approaches work if targeted participants have strong incentives to voluntarily contribute effort.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)111-131
Number of pages21
JournalJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization
Volume189
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Jul 2021

Keywords

  • Accountability
  • Community forestry
  • Internal monitoring
  • Participatory development
  • Top-down monitoring

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Internal versus top-down monitoring in community resource management: Experimental evidence from Ethiopia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this