Integrating biocultural values in nature conservation

Perceptions of culturally significant sites and species in adaptive management

Bas Verschuuren*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction Ecosystems not only consist of physical attributes, they are subjected to and influenced by cultural perceptions and values. As Schama notes, ‘Landscapes are culture before they are nature; constructs of the imagination projected onto wood water and rock’ (1995, p. 61). Schama goes further by stating that there is an elaborate frame through which our adult eyes survey the landscape and that before landscape can ever be a response for the senses, it is the work of the mind. This leads Schama to conclude that the landscape's scenery is built up as much from strata of memory as from layers of rock. Hence, cultural perceptions and shared history of landscapes result in different and even contesting meanings of ecosystems and landscapes (Stewart and Strathern, 2003; Mainteny, 2004). In some cultures the spiritual values of certain sites and species may be important enough for local people to conserve and protect the ecosystems that contain them. This occurs, even though an economic cost-benefit analysis may advise conversion of the ecosystem through resource development, such as mining or agriculture. To those people, the spiritual significance of rivers, mountains, or even individual tree or animal species such as the black-necked crane mentioned further on in this chapter, has led to their veneration and recognition as sacred (Verschuuren et al., 2010). Those sacred sites and species are increasingly known for their significant contribution to biodiversity values (Stewart and Strathern, 2003; Dudley et al., 2005; Putney, 2005; Bhagwat and Rutte, 2006; Verschuuren et al., 2010). Sacred places are often traditionally managed based on ancestral intergenerational principles that in many cases ensure cultural continuity and environmental management (Berkes, 1999; Jeanrenaud et al., 2001; Verschuuren, 2006). The cultural and spiritual importance of sacred sites and species is often ignored in Western-style landscape and ecosystem management. This chapter investigates the role of sacred sites and species in new emerging biocultural approaches in nature conservation and ecosystem management.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSacred Species and Sites
Subtitle of host publicationAdvances in Biocultural Conservation
EditorsGloria Pungetti, Gonzalo Oviedo, Della Hooke
PublisherCambridge University Press
Chapter16
Pages231-246
ISBN (Electronic)9781139030717
ISBN (Print)9780521110853
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

natural resources conservation
Ecosystem
ecosystems
ecosystem management
rocks
Imagination
economic costs
cost benefit analysis
landscape management
Biodiversity
environmental management
Agriculture
Rivers
Cost-Benefit Analysis
adaptive management
eyes
Economics
mountains
biodiversity
agriculture

Cite this

Verschuuren, B. (2012). Integrating biocultural values in nature conservation: Perceptions of culturally significant sites and species in adaptive management. In G. Pungetti, G. Oviedo, & D. Hooke (Eds.), Sacred Species and Sites: Advances in Biocultural Conservation (pp. 231-246). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139030717.023
Verschuuren, Bas. / Integrating biocultural values in nature conservation : Perceptions of culturally significant sites and species in adaptive management. Sacred Species and Sites: Advances in Biocultural Conservation. editor / Gloria Pungetti ; Gonzalo Oviedo ; Della Hooke. Cambridge University Press, 2012. pp. 231-246
@inbook{9784aec8ff21479ead693bfbe6c5e590,
title = "Integrating biocultural values in nature conservation: Perceptions of culturally significant sites and species in adaptive management",
abstract = "Introduction Ecosystems not only consist of physical attributes, they are subjected to and influenced by cultural perceptions and values. As Schama notes, ‘Landscapes are culture before they are nature; constructs of the imagination projected onto wood water and rock’ (1995, p. 61). Schama goes further by stating that there is an elaborate frame through which our adult eyes survey the landscape and that before landscape can ever be a response for the senses, it is the work of the mind. This leads Schama to conclude that the landscape's scenery is built up as much from strata of memory as from layers of rock. Hence, cultural perceptions and shared history of landscapes result in different and even contesting meanings of ecosystems and landscapes (Stewart and Strathern, 2003; Mainteny, 2004). In some cultures the spiritual values of certain sites and species may be important enough for local people to conserve and protect the ecosystems that contain them. This occurs, even though an economic cost-benefit analysis may advise conversion of the ecosystem through resource development, such as mining or agriculture. To those people, the spiritual significance of rivers, mountains, or even individual tree or animal species such as the black-necked crane mentioned further on in this chapter, has led to their veneration and recognition as sacred (Verschuuren et al., 2010). Those sacred sites and species are increasingly known for their significant contribution to biodiversity values (Stewart and Strathern, 2003; Dudley et al., 2005; Putney, 2005; Bhagwat and Rutte, 2006; Verschuuren et al., 2010). Sacred places are often traditionally managed based on ancestral intergenerational principles that in many cases ensure cultural continuity and environmental management (Berkes, 1999; Jeanrenaud et al., 2001; Verschuuren, 2006). The cultural and spiritual importance of sacred sites and species is often ignored in Western-style landscape and ecosystem management. This chapter investigates the role of sacred sites and species in new emerging biocultural approaches in nature conservation and ecosystem management.",
author = "Bas Verschuuren",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9781139030717.023",
language = "English",
isbn = "9780521110853",
pages = "231--246",
editor = "Gloria Pungetti and Gonzalo Oviedo and Della Hooke",
booktitle = "Sacred Species and Sites",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

Verschuuren, B 2012, Integrating biocultural values in nature conservation: Perceptions of culturally significant sites and species in adaptive management. in G Pungetti, G Oviedo & D Hooke (eds), Sacred Species and Sites: Advances in Biocultural Conservation. Cambridge University Press, pp. 231-246. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139030717.023

Integrating biocultural values in nature conservation : Perceptions of culturally significant sites and species in adaptive management. / Verschuuren, Bas.

Sacred Species and Sites: Advances in Biocultural Conservation. ed. / Gloria Pungetti; Gonzalo Oviedo; Della Hooke. Cambridge University Press, 2012. p. 231-246.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Integrating biocultural values in nature conservation

T2 - Perceptions of culturally significant sites and species in adaptive management

AU - Verschuuren, Bas

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Introduction Ecosystems not only consist of physical attributes, they are subjected to and influenced by cultural perceptions and values. As Schama notes, ‘Landscapes are culture before they are nature; constructs of the imagination projected onto wood water and rock’ (1995, p. 61). Schama goes further by stating that there is an elaborate frame through which our adult eyes survey the landscape and that before landscape can ever be a response for the senses, it is the work of the mind. This leads Schama to conclude that the landscape's scenery is built up as much from strata of memory as from layers of rock. Hence, cultural perceptions and shared history of landscapes result in different and even contesting meanings of ecosystems and landscapes (Stewart and Strathern, 2003; Mainteny, 2004). In some cultures the spiritual values of certain sites and species may be important enough for local people to conserve and protect the ecosystems that contain them. This occurs, even though an economic cost-benefit analysis may advise conversion of the ecosystem through resource development, such as mining or agriculture. To those people, the spiritual significance of rivers, mountains, or even individual tree or animal species such as the black-necked crane mentioned further on in this chapter, has led to their veneration and recognition as sacred (Verschuuren et al., 2010). Those sacred sites and species are increasingly known for their significant contribution to biodiversity values (Stewart and Strathern, 2003; Dudley et al., 2005; Putney, 2005; Bhagwat and Rutte, 2006; Verschuuren et al., 2010). Sacred places are often traditionally managed based on ancestral intergenerational principles that in many cases ensure cultural continuity and environmental management (Berkes, 1999; Jeanrenaud et al., 2001; Verschuuren, 2006). The cultural and spiritual importance of sacred sites and species is often ignored in Western-style landscape and ecosystem management. This chapter investigates the role of sacred sites and species in new emerging biocultural approaches in nature conservation and ecosystem management.

AB - Introduction Ecosystems not only consist of physical attributes, they are subjected to and influenced by cultural perceptions and values. As Schama notes, ‘Landscapes are culture before they are nature; constructs of the imagination projected onto wood water and rock’ (1995, p. 61). Schama goes further by stating that there is an elaborate frame through which our adult eyes survey the landscape and that before landscape can ever be a response for the senses, it is the work of the mind. This leads Schama to conclude that the landscape's scenery is built up as much from strata of memory as from layers of rock. Hence, cultural perceptions and shared history of landscapes result in different and even contesting meanings of ecosystems and landscapes (Stewart and Strathern, 2003; Mainteny, 2004). In some cultures the spiritual values of certain sites and species may be important enough for local people to conserve and protect the ecosystems that contain them. This occurs, even though an economic cost-benefit analysis may advise conversion of the ecosystem through resource development, such as mining or agriculture. To those people, the spiritual significance of rivers, mountains, or even individual tree or animal species such as the black-necked crane mentioned further on in this chapter, has led to their veneration and recognition as sacred (Verschuuren et al., 2010). Those sacred sites and species are increasingly known for their significant contribution to biodiversity values (Stewart and Strathern, 2003; Dudley et al., 2005; Putney, 2005; Bhagwat and Rutte, 2006; Verschuuren et al., 2010). Sacred places are often traditionally managed based on ancestral intergenerational principles that in many cases ensure cultural continuity and environmental management (Berkes, 1999; Jeanrenaud et al., 2001; Verschuuren, 2006). The cultural and spiritual importance of sacred sites and species is often ignored in Western-style landscape and ecosystem management. This chapter investigates the role of sacred sites and species in new emerging biocultural approaches in nature conservation and ecosystem management.

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9781139030717.023

DO - 10.1017/CBO9781139030717.023

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780521110853

SP - 231

EP - 246

BT - Sacred Species and Sites

A2 - Pungetti, Gloria

A2 - Oviedo, Gonzalo

A2 - Hooke, Della

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -

Verschuuren B. Integrating biocultural values in nature conservation: Perceptions of culturally significant sites and species in adaptive management. In Pungetti G, Oviedo G, Hooke D, editors, Sacred Species and Sites: Advances in Biocultural Conservation. Cambridge University Press. 2012. p. 231-246 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139030717.023