Institutionalized Communication in Markets and Firms

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Abstract: How markets and firms function is critically related to what knowledge and information is exchanged between whom, how quickly. Exchange of (symbolic) information needs to be properly institutionalized in order to be understood by others, on the one hand, but, on the other hand, cannot avoid being ambiguous to some degree as well (Dolfsma et al. 2011). Ambiguity allows for the dissent that allows for innovation in the broadest sense of the term. Institutionalization of communication is community-specific. The tension between institutionalization of and ambiguity in communication explains why innovations cannot depart too much from what is known and accepted in a community to be (ultimately) accepted as a legitimate novelty. The view of markets and firms as settings for institutionalized communication and knowledge exchange offers a perspective that institutional economists are well positioned for to offer insights on.

LanguageEnglish
Pages341-348
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Economic Issues
Volume53
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Communication
Innovation
Institutionalization
Novelty
Institutional perspective
Economists
Information needs
Dissent
Knowledge exchange

Keywords

  • communication
  • firms as institutionalized communication
  • institutions
  • markets as institutionalized communication

Cite this

@article{30366c0a981d455bb0dd4b1b8c2f7e9a,
title = "Institutionalized Communication in Markets and Firms",
abstract = "Abstract: How markets and firms function is critically related to what knowledge and information is exchanged between whom, how quickly. Exchange of (symbolic) information needs to be properly institutionalized in order to be understood by others, on the one hand, but, on the other hand, cannot avoid being ambiguous to some degree as well (Dolfsma et al. 2011). Ambiguity allows for the dissent that allows for innovation in the broadest sense of the term. Institutionalization of communication is community-specific. The tension between institutionalization of and ambiguity in communication explains why innovations cannot depart too much from what is known and accepted in a community to be (ultimately) accepted as a legitimate novelty. The view of markets and firms as settings for institutionalized communication and knowledge exchange offers a perspective that institutional economists are well positioned for to offer insights on.",
keywords = "communication, firms as institutionalized communication, institutions, markets as institutionalized communication",
author = "Wilfred Dolfsma",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1080/00213624.2019.1594500",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "341--348",
journal = "Journal of Economic Issues",
issn = "0021-3624",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "2",

}

Institutionalized Communication in Markets and Firms. / Dolfsma, Wilfred.

In: Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 53, No. 2, 03.04.2019, p. 341-348.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Institutionalized Communication in Markets and Firms

AU - Dolfsma, Wilfred

PY - 2019/4/3

Y1 - 2019/4/3

N2 - Abstract: How markets and firms function is critically related to what knowledge and information is exchanged between whom, how quickly. Exchange of (symbolic) information needs to be properly institutionalized in order to be understood by others, on the one hand, but, on the other hand, cannot avoid being ambiguous to some degree as well (Dolfsma et al. 2011). Ambiguity allows for the dissent that allows for innovation in the broadest sense of the term. Institutionalization of communication is community-specific. The tension between institutionalization of and ambiguity in communication explains why innovations cannot depart too much from what is known and accepted in a community to be (ultimately) accepted as a legitimate novelty. The view of markets and firms as settings for institutionalized communication and knowledge exchange offers a perspective that institutional economists are well positioned for to offer insights on.

AB - Abstract: How markets and firms function is critically related to what knowledge and information is exchanged between whom, how quickly. Exchange of (symbolic) information needs to be properly institutionalized in order to be understood by others, on the one hand, but, on the other hand, cannot avoid being ambiguous to some degree as well (Dolfsma et al. 2011). Ambiguity allows for the dissent that allows for innovation in the broadest sense of the term. Institutionalization of communication is community-specific. The tension between institutionalization of and ambiguity in communication explains why innovations cannot depart too much from what is known and accepted in a community to be (ultimately) accepted as a legitimate novelty. The view of markets and firms as settings for institutionalized communication and knowledge exchange offers a perspective that institutional economists are well positioned for to offer insights on.

KW - communication

KW - firms as institutionalized communication

KW - institutions

KW - markets as institutionalized communication

U2 - 10.1080/00213624.2019.1594500

DO - 10.1080/00213624.2019.1594500

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 341

EP - 348

JO - Journal of Economic Issues

T2 - Journal of Economic Issues

JF - Journal of Economic Issues

SN - 0021-3624

IS - 2

ER -