Institutional perspectives of climate-smart agriculture: A systematic literature review

Edmond Totin, Alcade C. Segnon, Marc Schut, Hippolyte Affognon, Robert B. Zougmoré, Todd Rosenstock, Philip K. Thornton

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) is increasingly seen as a promising approach to feed the growing world population under climate change. The review explored how institutional perspectives are reflected in the CSA literature. In total, 137 publications were analyzed using institutional analysis framework, of which 55.5% make specific reference to institutional dimensions. While the CSA concept encompasses three pillars (productivity, adaptation, and mitigation), the literature has hardly addressed them in an integrated way. The development status of study sites also seems to influence which pillars are promoted. Mitigation was predominantly addressed in high-income countries, while productivity and adaptation were priorities for middle and low-income countries. Interest in institutional aspects has been gradual in the CSA literature. It has largely focused on knowledge infrastructure, market structure, and hard institutional aspects. There has been less attention to understand whether investments in physical infrastructure and actors' interaction, or how historical, political, and social context may influence the uptake of CSA options. Rethinking the approach to promoting CSA technologies by integrating technology packages and institutional enabling factors can provide potential opportunities for effective scaling of CSA options.

LanguageEnglish
Article number1990
JournalSustainability (Switzerland)
Volume10
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Jun 2018

Fingerprint

literature review
Agriculture
agriculture
climate
pillar
mitigation
Productivity
productivity
infrastructure
income
world population
literature
scaling
Climate change
low income
climate change
market
interaction

Keywords

  • Adaptation
  • Climate-smart agriculture
  • Institutions
  • Mitigation
  • Systematic review

Cite this

Totin, E., Segnon, A. C., Schut, M., Affognon, H., Zougmoré, R. B., Rosenstock, T., & Thornton, P. K. (2018). Institutional perspectives of climate-smart agriculture: A systematic literature review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(6), [1990]. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061990
Totin, Edmond ; Segnon, Alcade C. ; Schut, Marc ; Affognon, Hippolyte ; Zougmoré, Robert B. ; Rosenstock, Todd ; Thornton, Philip K. / Institutional perspectives of climate-smart agriculture : A systematic literature review. In: Sustainability (Switzerland). 2018 ; Vol. 10, No. 6.
@article{fd6e519af6e945458c788fda6e1b7793,
title = "Institutional perspectives of climate-smart agriculture: A systematic literature review",
abstract = "Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) is increasingly seen as a promising approach to feed the growing world population under climate change. The review explored how institutional perspectives are reflected in the CSA literature. In total, 137 publications were analyzed using institutional analysis framework, of which 55.5{\%} make specific reference to institutional dimensions. While the CSA concept encompasses three pillars (productivity, adaptation, and mitigation), the literature has hardly addressed them in an integrated way. The development status of study sites also seems to influence which pillars are promoted. Mitigation was predominantly addressed in high-income countries, while productivity and adaptation were priorities for middle and low-income countries. Interest in institutional aspects has been gradual in the CSA literature. It has largely focused on knowledge infrastructure, market structure, and hard institutional aspects. There has been less attention to understand whether investments in physical infrastructure and actors' interaction, or how historical, political, and social context may influence the uptake of CSA options. Rethinking the approach to promoting CSA technologies by integrating technology packages and institutional enabling factors can provide potential opportunities for effective scaling of CSA options.",
keywords = "Adaptation, Climate-smart agriculture, Institutions, Mitigation, Systematic review",
author = "Edmond Totin and Segnon, {Alcade C.} and Marc Schut and Hippolyte Affognon and Zougmor{\'e}, {Robert B.} and Todd Rosenstock and Thornton, {Philip K.}",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "13",
doi = "10.3390/su10061990",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "Sustainability",
issn = "2071-1050",
publisher = "MDPI",
number = "6",

}

Totin, E, Segnon, AC, Schut, M, Affognon, H, Zougmoré, RB, Rosenstock, T & Thornton, PK 2018, 'Institutional perspectives of climate-smart agriculture: A systematic literature review', Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 10, no. 6, 1990. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061990

Institutional perspectives of climate-smart agriculture : A systematic literature review. / Totin, Edmond; Segnon, Alcade C.; Schut, Marc; Affognon, Hippolyte; Zougmoré, Robert B.; Rosenstock, Todd; Thornton, Philip K.

In: Sustainability (Switzerland), Vol. 10, No. 6, 1990, 13.06.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Institutional perspectives of climate-smart agriculture

T2 - Sustainability

AU - Totin, Edmond

AU - Segnon, Alcade C.

AU - Schut, Marc

AU - Affognon, Hippolyte

AU - Zougmoré, Robert B.

AU - Rosenstock, Todd

AU - Thornton, Philip K.

PY - 2018/6/13

Y1 - 2018/6/13

N2 - Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) is increasingly seen as a promising approach to feed the growing world population under climate change. The review explored how institutional perspectives are reflected in the CSA literature. In total, 137 publications were analyzed using institutional analysis framework, of which 55.5% make specific reference to institutional dimensions. While the CSA concept encompasses three pillars (productivity, adaptation, and mitigation), the literature has hardly addressed them in an integrated way. The development status of study sites also seems to influence which pillars are promoted. Mitigation was predominantly addressed in high-income countries, while productivity and adaptation were priorities for middle and low-income countries. Interest in institutional aspects has been gradual in the CSA literature. It has largely focused on knowledge infrastructure, market structure, and hard institutional aspects. There has been less attention to understand whether investments in physical infrastructure and actors' interaction, or how historical, political, and social context may influence the uptake of CSA options. Rethinking the approach to promoting CSA technologies by integrating technology packages and institutional enabling factors can provide potential opportunities for effective scaling of CSA options.

AB - Climate-smart agriculture (CSA) is increasingly seen as a promising approach to feed the growing world population under climate change. The review explored how institutional perspectives are reflected in the CSA literature. In total, 137 publications were analyzed using institutional analysis framework, of which 55.5% make specific reference to institutional dimensions. While the CSA concept encompasses three pillars (productivity, adaptation, and mitigation), the literature has hardly addressed them in an integrated way. The development status of study sites also seems to influence which pillars are promoted. Mitigation was predominantly addressed in high-income countries, while productivity and adaptation were priorities for middle and low-income countries. Interest in institutional aspects has been gradual in the CSA literature. It has largely focused on knowledge infrastructure, market structure, and hard institutional aspects. There has been less attention to understand whether investments in physical infrastructure and actors' interaction, or how historical, political, and social context may influence the uptake of CSA options. Rethinking the approach to promoting CSA technologies by integrating technology packages and institutional enabling factors can provide potential opportunities for effective scaling of CSA options.

KW - Adaptation

KW - Climate-smart agriculture

KW - Institutions

KW - Mitigation

KW - Systematic review

U2 - 10.3390/su10061990

DO - 10.3390/su10061990

M3 - Review article

VL - 10

JO - Sustainability

JF - Sustainability

SN - 2071-1050

IS - 6

M1 - 1990

ER -