Institutional Interactions at the Crossroads of Trade and Environment: The Dominance of Liberal Environmentalism?

F. Zelli, A. Gupta, H. van Asselt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article argues that institutional interactions that cut across the domains of trade and environment are embedded in overarching norms that shape their evolution and impact. In making this argument, it analyzes three cases of such interactions within the climate change and biosafety regime complexes: those relating to trade-related climate policies and measures, forest carbon sinks, and trade in genetically modified organisms. The analysis highlights the dominance of liberal environmentalism (a set of global norms promoting economic efficiency and environmental improvements through market-based mechanisms) in shaping institutional interactions within these regime complexes, even as liberal environmentalism is contested by key actors. This, in turn, has implications for effective management of institutional interlinkages within regime complexes in global environmental governance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)105-118
JournalGlobal Governance : a Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations
Volume19
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013

Fingerprint

environmentalism
regime
interaction
biosafety
genetically modified organism
climate policy
carbon sink
economic efficiency
Climate change
environmental policy
climate change
governance
Economics
Carbon
market
management
economics
norm

Keywords

  • transparency
  • protocol
  • kyoto

Cite this

@article{b2ff68ee46064652a748ee02acc6c6e5,
title = "Institutional Interactions at the Crossroads of Trade and Environment: The Dominance of Liberal Environmentalism?",
abstract = "This article argues that institutional interactions that cut across the domains of trade and environment are embedded in overarching norms that shape their evolution and impact. In making this argument, it analyzes three cases of such interactions within the climate change and biosafety regime complexes: those relating to trade-related climate policies and measures, forest carbon sinks, and trade in genetically modified organisms. The analysis highlights the dominance of liberal environmentalism (a set of global norms promoting economic efficiency and environmental improvements through market-based mechanisms) in shaping institutional interactions within these regime complexes, even as liberal environmentalism is contested by key actors. This, in turn, has implications for effective management of institutional interlinkages within regime complexes in global environmental governance.",
keywords = "transparency, protocol, kyoto",
author = "F. Zelli and A. Gupta and {van Asselt}, H.",
note = "doi werkt niet",
year = "2013",
doi = "10.5555/1075-2846-19.1.105",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "105--118",
journal = "Global Governance : a Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations",
issn = "1075-2846",
publisher = "Lynne Rienner Publishers",
number = "1",

}

Institutional Interactions at the Crossroads of Trade and Environment: The Dominance of Liberal Environmentalism? / Zelli, F.; Gupta, A.; van Asselt, H.

In: Global Governance : a Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2013, p. 105-118.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Institutional Interactions at the Crossroads of Trade and Environment: The Dominance of Liberal Environmentalism?

AU - Zelli, F.

AU - Gupta, A.

AU - van Asselt, H.

N1 - doi werkt niet

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - This article argues that institutional interactions that cut across the domains of trade and environment are embedded in overarching norms that shape their evolution and impact. In making this argument, it analyzes three cases of such interactions within the climate change and biosafety regime complexes: those relating to trade-related climate policies and measures, forest carbon sinks, and trade in genetically modified organisms. The analysis highlights the dominance of liberal environmentalism (a set of global norms promoting economic efficiency and environmental improvements through market-based mechanisms) in shaping institutional interactions within these regime complexes, even as liberal environmentalism is contested by key actors. This, in turn, has implications for effective management of institutional interlinkages within regime complexes in global environmental governance.

AB - This article argues that institutional interactions that cut across the domains of trade and environment are embedded in overarching norms that shape their evolution and impact. In making this argument, it analyzes three cases of such interactions within the climate change and biosafety regime complexes: those relating to trade-related climate policies and measures, forest carbon sinks, and trade in genetically modified organisms. The analysis highlights the dominance of liberal environmentalism (a set of global norms promoting economic efficiency and environmental improvements through market-based mechanisms) in shaping institutional interactions within these regime complexes, even as liberal environmentalism is contested by key actors. This, in turn, has implications for effective management of institutional interlinkages within regime complexes in global environmental governance.

KW - transparency

KW - protocol

KW - kyoto

U2 - 10.5555/1075-2846-19.1.105

DO - 10.5555/1075-2846-19.1.105

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 105

EP - 118

JO - Global Governance : a Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations

JF - Global Governance : a Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations

SN - 1075-2846

IS - 1

ER -