Innovation platforms in agricultural research development: Ex-ante Appraisal of the Purposes and Conditions Under Which Innovation Platforms can Contribute to Agricultural Development Outcomes

Marc Schut, Josey Kamanda, Andreas Gramzow, Thomas Dubois, Dietmar Stoian, Jens A. Andersson, Iddo Dror, Murat Sartas, Remco Mur, Shinan Kassam, Herman Brouwer, André Devaux, Claudio Velasco, Rica Joy Flor, Martin Gummert, Djuna Buizer, Cynthia Mcdougall, Kristin Davis, Sabine Homann-Kee Tui, Mark Lundy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Innovation platforms are fast becoming part of the mantra of agricultural research for development projects and programmes. Their basic tenet is that stakeholders depend on one another to achieve agricultural development outcomes, and hence need a space where they can learn, negotiate and coordinate to overcome challenges and capture opportunities through a facilitated innovation process. Although much has been written on how to implement and facilitate innovation platforms efficiently, few studies support ex-ante appraisal of when and for what purpose innovation platforms provide an appropriate mechanism for achieving development outcomes, and what kinds of human and financial resource investments and enabling environments are required. Without these insights, innovation platforms run the risk of being promoted as a panacea for all problems in the agricultural sector. This study makes clear that not all constraints will require innovation platforms and, if there is a simpler and cheaper alternative, that should be considered first. Based on the review of critical design principles and plausible outcomes of innovation platforms, this study provides a decision support tool for research, development and funding agencies that can enhance more critical thinking about the purposes and conditions under which innovation platforms can contribute to achieving agricultural development outcomes.
LanguageEnglish
Pages575-596
JournalExperimental Agriculture
Volume55
Issue number4
Early online date6 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2019

Fingerprint

development projects
agricultural industry
research and development
agricultural research
economic valuation
funding
stakeholders

Cite this

Schut, Marc ; Kamanda, Josey ; Gramzow, Andreas ; Dubois, Thomas ; Stoian, Dietmar ; Andersson, Jens A. ; Dror, Iddo ; Sartas, Murat ; Mur, Remco ; Kassam, Shinan ; Brouwer, Herman ; Devaux, André ; Velasco, Claudio ; Flor, Rica Joy ; Gummert, Martin ; Buizer, Djuna ; Mcdougall, Cynthia ; Davis, Kristin ; Tui, Sabine Homann-Kee ; Lundy, Mark. / Innovation platforms in agricultural research development : Ex-ante Appraisal of the Purposes and Conditions Under Which Innovation Platforms can Contribute to Agricultural Development Outcomes. In: Experimental Agriculture. 2019 ; Vol. 55, No. 4. pp. 575-596.
@article{73b6ca395100433b908a769d441bfb4f,
title = "Innovation platforms in agricultural research development: Ex-ante Appraisal of the Purposes and Conditions Under Which Innovation Platforms can Contribute to Agricultural Development Outcomes",
abstract = "Innovation platforms are fast becoming part of the mantra of agricultural research for development projects and programmes. Their basic tenet is that stakeholders depend on one another to achieve agricultural development outcomes, and hence need a space where they can learn, negotiate and coordinate to overcome challenges and capture opportunities through a facilitated innovation process. Although much has been written on how to implement and facilitate innovation platforms efficiently, few studies support ex-ante appraisal of when and for what purpose innovation platforms provide an appropriate mechanism for achieving development outcomes, and what kinds of human and financial resource investments and enabling environments are required. Without these insights, innovation platforms run the risk of being promoted as a panacea for all problems in the agricultural sector. This study makes clear that not all constraints will require innovation platforms and, if there is a simpler and cheaper alternative, that should be considered first. Based on the review of critical design principles and plausible outcomes of innovation platforms, this study provides a decision support tool for research, development and funding agencies that can enhance more critical thinking about the purposes and conditions under which innovation platforms can contribute to achieving agricultural development outcomes.",
author = "Marc Schut and Josey Kamanda and Andreas Gramzow and Thomas Dubois and Dietmar Stoian and Andersson, {Jens A.} and Iddo Dror and Murat Sartas and Remco Mur and Shinan Kassam and Herman Brouwer and Andr{\'e} Devaux and Claudio Velasco and Flor, {Rica Joy} and Martin Gummert and Djuna Buizer and Cynthia Mcdougall and Kristin Davis and Tui, {Sabine Homann-Kee} and Mark Lundy",
year = "2019",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1017/S0014479718000200",
language = "English",
volume = "55",
pages = "575--596",
journal = "Experimental Agriculture",
issn = "0014-4797",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "4",

}

Schut, M, Kamanda, J, Gramzow, A, Dubois, T, Stoian, D, Andersson, JA, Dror, I, Sartas, M, Mur, R, Kassam, S, Brouwer, H, Devaux, A, Velasco, C, Flor, RJ, Gummert, M, Buizer, D, Mcdougall, C, Davis, K, Tui, SH-K & Lundy, M 2019, 'Innovation platforms in agricultural research development: Ex-ante Appraisal of the Purposes and Conditions Under Which Innovation Platforms can Contribute to Agricultural Development Outcomes', Experimental Agriculture, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 575-596. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479718000200

Innovation platforms in agricultural research development : Ex-ante Appraisal of the Purposes and Conditions Under Which Innovation Platforms can Contribute to Agricultural Development Outcomes. / Schut, Marc; Kamanda, Josey; Gramzow, Andreas; Dubois, Thomas; Stoian, Dietmar; Andersson, Jens A.; Dror, Iddo; Sartas, Murat; Mur, Remco; Kassam, Shinan; Brouwer, Herman; Devaux, André; Velasco, Claudio; Flor, Rica Joy; Gummert, Martin; Buizer, Djuna; Mcdougall, Cynthia; Davis, Kristin; Tui, Sabine Homann-Kee; Lundy, Mark.

In: Experimental Agriculture, Vol. 55, No. 4, 08.2019, p. 575-596.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Innovation platforms in agricultural research development

T2 - Experimental Agriculture

AU - Schut, Marc

AU - Kamanda, Josey

AU - Gramzow, Andreas

AU - Dubois, Thomas

AU - Stoian, Dietmar

AU - Andersson, Jens A.

AU - Dror, Iddo

AU - Sartas, Murat

AU - Mur, Remco

AU - Kassam, Shinan

AU - Brouwer, Herman

AU - Devaux, André

AU - Velasco, Claudio

AU - Flor, Rica Joy

AU - Gummert, Martin

AU - Buizer, Djuna

AU - Mcdougall, Cynthia

AU - Davis, Kristin

AU - Tui, Sabine Homann-Kee

AU - Lundy, Mark

PY - 2019/8

Y1 - 2019/8

N2 - Innovation platforms are fast becoming part of the mantra of agricultural research for development projects and programmes. Their basic tenet is that stakeholders depend on one another to achieve agricultural development outcomes, and hence need a space where they can learn, negotiate and coordinate to overcome challenges and capture opportunities through a facilitated innovation process. Although much has been written on how to implement and facilitate innovation platforms efficiently, few studies support ex-ante appraisal of when and for what purpose innovation platforms provide an appropriate mechanism for achieving development outcomes, and what kinds of human and financial resource investments and enabling environments are required. Without these insights, innovation platforms run the risk of being promoted as a panacea for all problems in the agricultural sector. This study makes clear that not all constraints will require innovation platforms and, if there is a simpler and cheaper alternative, that should be considered first. Based on the review of critical design principles and plausible outcomes of innovation platforms, this study provides a decision support tool for research, development and funding agencies that can enhance more critical thinking about the purposes and conditions under which innovation platforms can contribute to achieving agricultural development outcomes.

AB - Innovation platforms are fast becoming part of the mantra of agricultural research for development projects and programmes. Their basic tenet is that stakeholders depend on one another to achieve agricultural development outcomes, and hence need a space where they can learn, negotiate and coordinate to overcome challenges and capture opportunities through a facilitated innovation process. Although much has been written on how to implement and facilitate innovation platforms efficiently, few studies support ex-ante appraisal of when and for what purpose innovation platforms provide an appropriate mechanism for achieving development outcomes, and what kinds of human and financial resource investments and enabling environments are required. Without these insights, innovation platforms run the risk of being promoted as a panacea for all problems in the agricultural sector. This study makes clear that not all constraints will require innovation platforms and, if there is a simpler and cheaper alternative, that should be considered first. Based on the review of critical design principles and plausible outcomes of innovation platforms, this study provides a decision support tool for research, development and funding agencies that can enhance more critical thinking about the purposes and conditions under which innovation platforms can contribute to achieving agricultural development outcomes.

U2 - 10.1017/S0014479718000200

DO - 10.1017/S0014479718000200

M3 - Article

VL - 55

SP - 575

EP - 596

JO - Experimental Agriculture

JF - Experimental Agriculture

SN - 0014-4797

IS - 4

ER -