In pursuit of carbon accountability: the politics of REDD+ measuring, reporting and verification systems

A. Gupta, E. Lövbrand, E. Turnhout, M.J. Vijge

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

84 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article reviews critical social science analyses of carbonaccounting and monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) systems associated with reducing emissions from deforestation, forest degradation and conservation, sustainable use and enhancement of forest carbon stocks (REDD+). REDD+ MRV systems are often portrayed as technical. In questioning such a framing, we draw on perspectives from science and technology and governmentality studies to assess how MRV systems may exercise disciplinary power (through standardization, simplification and erasing the local) but also mobilize counterexpertise, produce resistance and thus have necessarily contingent effects. In doing so, we advance the concept of ‘carbon accountability’ to denote both how forest carbon is accounted for in REDD+ and the need to hold to account those who are doing so.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)726-731
JournalCurrent Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
Volume4
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Keywords

  • green governmentality
  • climate-change
  • costa-rica
  • offsets
  • governance
  • biodiversity
  • forestry
  • space
  • materiality
  • legitimacy

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'In pursuit of carbon accountability: the politics of REDD+ measuring, reporting and verification systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this