Abstract
Communication problems need to be solved if managers are to be more persuasive about the need for limitations on fishing, to protect and restore fish populations. The context is widespread scepticism about the effectiveness of management on both sides of the Atlantic. That scepticism is fuelled by assessment bias as seen in the case of the northern cod of Newfoundland, and by failure to take into account differences in perceptions of stock size and fishing mortality, differences in causal reasoning about fishing pressure and environmental factors influencing stock size; and differences in the capacity to read and understand the mostly graphic information that underlies and is often used to explain management decisions. This analysis is based on interviews and observations in the European Union and the northeastern USA.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 811-817 |
| Journal | ICES Journal of Marine Science |
| Volume | 64 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2007 |
Keywords
- resources
- collapse
- science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Improving communication from managers to fisheres in Europe and the US'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver