TY - CONF
T1 - Implications for the inter-organizational design of environmental care when changing environmental control points
AU - Hagelaar, J.L.F.
AU - Seuring, S.
PY - 2006
Y1 - 2006
N2 - In this paper we try to bridge the gap between two lines of thought within the environmental
care literature. We differentiate between two major clusters in this literature; (1)
environmental management and (2) strategic approach to environmental care. Although both
approaches focus on the same object i.e. management of environmental care, the two bodies
of knowledge apply different starting points. The first one focuses on the physical material
flow and effects, the second approach starts with the weighing between the opportunities in
the environment and the internal organizational possibilities. Our assumption is that the two
approaches are complementary. In constructing the bridge we conclude that the approaches
are indeed complementary. In combining the two approaches, the starting points can be
intertwined. This combination of approaches opens the possibility to relate the physical
environment, by means of control points, to the strategic weightings. In this sense, the control
points, and in line with that the physical environment together with strategic considerations,
form for managers the conditions for their design of inter-organizational environmental care.
By altering physical control points and or strategic focus, the inter-organizational design of
environmental care will change as well. The integrative framework ends with a table in which
ideal typically control points, strategic focus and the inter-organizational design are
combined
AB - In this paper we try to bridge the gap between two lines of thought within the environmental
care literature. We differentiate between two major clusters in this literature; (1)
environmental management and (2) strategic approach to environmental care. Although both
approaches focus on the same object i.e. management of environmental care, the two bodies
of knowledge apply different starting points. The first one focuses on the physical material
flow and effects, the second approach starts with the weighing between the opportunities in
the environment and the internal organizational possibilities. Our assumption is that the two
approaches are complementary. In constructing the bridge we conclude that the approaches
are indeed complementary. In combining the two approaches, the starting points can be
intertwined. This combination of approaches opens the possibility to relate the physical
environment, by means of control points, to the strategic weightings. In this sense, the control
points, and in line with that the physical environment together with strategic considerations,
form for managers the conditions for their design of inter-organizational environmental care.
By altering physical control points and or strategic focus, the inter-organizational design of
environmental care will change as well. The integrative framework ends with a table in which
ideal typically control points, strategic focus and the inter-organizational design are
combined
M3 - Conference paper
ER -