Implementing wildlife disease surveillance in the Netherlands, a One Health approach

M. Maas*, A. Gröne, T. Kuiken, G. Van Schaik, H.I.J. Roest, J.W.B. Van Der Giessen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

The surveillance of (emerging) wildlife diseases can provide important, objective evidence of the circulation of pathogens of interest for veterinary and/or public health. The involvement of multiple research institutions in wildlife disease surveillance can ensure the best use of existing knowledge and expertise, but can also complicate or add challenges to the integration of wildlife disease surveillance components into a national programme. Documenting the existing efforts in a country's surveillance of wildlife diseases, including the institutes in which it takes place, provides a basis for policy-makers and authorities to identify gaps and priorities in their current surveillance programmes. This paper describes the wildlife disease surveillance activities taking place in the Netherlands. The authors recommend that, in addition to funding these current activities, surveillance resources should be allocated with the flexibility to allow for additional targeted surveillance, to detect and adequately respond to newly introduced or emerging pathogens. Similar structured overviews of wildlife disease surveillance in other countries would be very useful to facilitate international collaboration.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)863-874
JournalRevue scientifique et technique / Office International des Epizooties
Volume35
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

wildlife diseases
disease surveillance
Netherlands
monitoring
research institutions
pathogens
Administrative Personnel
funding
One Health initiative
Global Health
public health
Public Health
Research

Keywords

  • One health
  • Overview
  • Public health
  • Surveillance
  • The Netherlands
  • Veterinary health
  • Wildlife disease

Cite this

@article{7a98470f0ae74d0f953586bd1f7faa23,
title = "Implementing wildlife disease surveillance in the Netherlands, a One Health approach",
abstract = "The surveillance of (emerging) wildlife diseases can provide important, objective evidence of the circulation of pathogens of interest for veterinary and/or public health. The involvement of multiple research institutions in wildlife disease surveillance can ensure the best use of existing knowledge and expertise, but can also complicate or add challenges to the integration of wildlife disease surveillance components into a national programme. Documenting the existing efforts in a country's surveillance of wildlife diseases, including the institutes in which it takes place, provides a basis for policy-makers and authorities to identify gaps and priorities in their current surveillance programmes. This paper describes the wildlife disease surveillance activities taking place in the Netherlands. The authors recommend that, in addition to funding these current activities, surveillance resources should be allocated with the flexibility to allow for additional targeted surveillance, to detect and adequately respond to newly introduced or emerging pathogens. Similar structured overviews of wildlife disease surveillance in other countries would be very useful to facilitate international collaboration.",
keywords = "One health, Overview, Public health, Surveillance, The Netherlands, Veterinary health, Wildlife disease",
author = "M. Maas and A. Gr{\"o}ne and T. Kuiken and {Van Schaik}, G. and H.I.J. Roest and {Van Der Giessen}, J.W.B.",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.20506/rst.35.3.2575",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "863--874",
journal = "Revue scientifique et technique / Office International des Epizooties",
issn = "0253-1933",
publisher = "Office International des Epizooties",
number = "3",

}

Implementing wildlife disease surveillance in the Netherlands, a One Health approach. / Maas, M.; Gröne, A.; Kuiken, T.; Van Schaik, G.; Roest, H.I.J.; Van Der Giessen, J.W.B.

In: Revue scientifique et technique / Office International des Epizooties, Vol. 35, No. 3, 2016, p. 863-874.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementing wildlife disease surveillance in the Netherlands, a One Health approach

AU - Maas, M.

AU - Gröne, A.

AU - Kuiken, T.

AU - Van Schaik, G.

AU - Roest, H.I.J.

AU - Van Der Giessen, J.W.B.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The surveillance of (emerging) wildlife diseases can provide important, objective evidence of the circulation of pathogens of interest for veterinary and/or public health. The involvement of multiple research institutions in wildlife disease surveillance can ensure the best use of existing knowledge and expertise, but can also complicate or add challenges to the integration of wildlife disease surveillance components into a national programme. Documenting the existing efforts in a country's surveillance of wildlife diseases, including the institutes in which it takes place, provides a basis for policy-makers and authorities to identify gaps and priorities in their current surveillance programmes. This paper describes the wildlife disease surveillance activities taking place in the Netherlands. The authors recommend that, in addition to funding these current activities, surveillance resources should be allocated with the flexibility to allow for additional targeted surveillance, to detect and adequately respond to newly introduced or emerging pathogens. Similar structured overviews of wildlife disease surveillance in other countries would be very useful to facilitate international collaboration.

AB - The surveillance of (emerging) wildlife diseases can provide important, objective evidence of the circulation of pathogens of interest for veterinary and/or public health. The involvement of multiple research institutions in wildlife disease surveillance can ensure the best use of existing knowledge and expertise, but can also complicate or add challenges to the integration of wildlife disease surveillance components into a national programme. Documenting the existing efforts in a country's surveillance of wildlife diseases, including the institutes in which it takes place, provides a basis for policy-makers and authorities to identify gaps and priorities in their current surveillance programmes. This paper describes the wildlife disease surveillance activities taking place in the Netherlands. The authors recommend that, in addition to funding these current activities, surveillance resources should be allocated with the flexibility to allow for additional targeted surveillance, to detect and adequately respond to newly introduced or emerging pathogens. Similar structured overviews of wildlife disease surveillance in other countries would be very useful to facilitate international collaboration.

KW - One health

KW - Overview

KW - Public health

KW - Surveillance

KW - The Netherlands

KW - Veterinary health

KW - Wildlife disease

U2 - 10.20506/rst.35.3.2575

DO - 10.20506/rst.35.3.2575

M3 - Article

VL - 35

SP - 863

EP - 874

JO - Revue scientifique et technique / Office International des Epizooties

JF - Revue scientifique et technique / Office International des Epizooties

SN - 0253-1933

IS - 3

ER -