Implementation of the forest expansion policy in the Netherlands in the period 1986-2007: Decline in success?

P. Van Gossum, B.J.M. Arts, J.N. van Laar, K. Verheyen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The current study explains why Dutch forest expansion policy is at risk of failure. To study the forest expansion implementation process we have chosen to further operationalize Matland's policy type implementation model to an extended and comprehensive typology of relevant implementation characteristics. In addition, a case study methodology with mixed-method design was used to collect and analyze the data. The Dutch forest expansion policy is currently an example of symbolic implementation. The symbolic implementation is a consequence of the absence of central guidance, the legislative complexity, the low policy stability, the lack of supporting conditions for policy innovation, the lack of regulatory responsiveness and the latent policy at state level and in many provinces. Nevertheless, the transferable development rights method of the province of Limburg is a promising innovation and forest expansion still happens, which is mainly the result of a good internal and external communication, an effective actor network of forest expansion advocates and the willingness to realize negotiated project aims that lead to a win–win situation for all actors involved. Nonetheless, it is expected that the forest expansion targets will be not reached, unless most of the above shortcomings are solved
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1171-1180
JournalLand Use Policy
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010

Fingerprint

Netherlands
innovation
implementation process
innovation policy
lack
design method
typology
policy
methodology
communication
case studies
province

Keywords

  • incentives
  • land

Cite this

@article{eda7eaa15ca4429cac6fee80a5def0f9,
title = "Implementation of the forest expansion policy in the Netherlands in the period 1986-2007: Decline in success?",
abstract = "The current study explains why Dutch forest expansion policy is at risk of failure. To study the forest expansion implementation process we have chosen to further operationalize Matland's policy type implementation model to an extended and comprehensive typology of relevant implementation characteristics. In addition, a case study methodology with mixed-method design was used to collect and analyze the data. The Dutch forest expansion policy is currently an example of symbolic implementation. The symbolic implementation is a consequence of the absence of central guidance, the legislative complexity, the low policy stability, the lack of supporting conditions for policy innovation, the lack of regulatory responsiveness and the latent policy at state level and in many provinces. Nevertheless, the transferable development rights method of the province of Limburg is a promising innovation and forest expansion still happens, which is mainly the result of a good internal and external communication, an effective actor network of forest expansion advocates and the willingness to realize negotiated project aims that lead to a win–win situation for all actors involved. Nonetheless, it is expected that the forest expansion targets will be not reached, unless most of the above shortcomings are solved",
keywords = "incentives, land",
author = "{Van Gossum}, P. and B.J.M. Arts and {van Laar}, J.N. and K. Verheyen",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.03.007",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "1171--1180",
journal = "Land Use Policy",
issn = "0264-8377",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

Implementation of the forest expansion policy in the Netherlands in the period 1986-2007: Decline in success? / Van Gossum, P.; Arts, B.J.M.; van Laar, J.N.; Verheyen, K.

In: Land Use Policy, Vol. 27, No. 4, 2010, p. 1171-1180.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Implementation of the forest expansion policy in the Netherlands in the period 1986-2007: Decline in success?

AU - Van Gossum, P.

AU - Arts, B.J.M.

AU - van Laar, J.N.

AU - Verheyen, K.

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - The current study explains why Dutch forest expansion policy is at risk of failure. To study the forest expansion implementation process we have chosen to further operationalize Matland's policy type implementation model to an extended and comprehensive typology of relevant implementation characteristics. In addition, a case study methodology with mixed-method design was used to collect and analyze the data. The Dutch forest expansion policy is currently an example of symbolic implementation. The symbolic implementation is a consequence of the absence of central guidance, the legislative complexity, the low policy stability, the lack of supporting conditions for policy innovation, the lack of regulatory responsiveness and the latent policy at state level and in many provinces. Nevertheless, the transferable development rights method of the province of Limburg is a promising innovation and forest expansion still happens, which is mainly the result of a good internal and external communication, an effective actor network of forest expansion advocates and the willingness to realize negotiated project aims that lead to a win–win situation for all actors involved. Nonetheless, it is expected that the forest expansion targets will be not reached, unless most of the above shortcomings are solved

AB - The current study explains why Dutch forest expansion policy is at risk of failure. To study the forest expansion implementation process we have chosen to further operationalize Matland's policy type implementation model to an extended and comprehensive typology of relevant implementation characteristics. In addition, a case study methodology with mixed-method design was used to collect and analyze the data. The Dutch forest expansion policy is currently an example of symbolic implementation. The symbolic implementation is a consequence of the absence of central guidance, the legislative complexity, the low policy stability, the lack of supporting conditions for policy innovation, the lack of regulatory responsiveness and the latent policy at state level and in many provinces. Nevertheless, the transferable development rights method of the province of Limburg is a promising innovation and forest expansion still happens, which is mainly the result of a good internal and external communication, an effective actor network of forest expansion advocates and the willingness to realize negotiated project aims that lead to a win–win situation for all actors involved. Nonetheless, it is expected that the forest expansion targets will be not reached, unless most of the above shortcomings are solved

KW - incentives

KW - land

U2 - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.03.007

DO - 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.03.007

M3 - Article

VL - 27

SP - 1171

EP - 1180

JO - Land Use Policy

JF - Land Use Policy

SN - 0264-8377

IS - 4

ER -