Impacts of Online Peer Feedback Supported by Argumentation Instruction and Argumentative Scripts on Students' Learning

Saeed Latifi, O. Noroozi, H.J.A. Biemans, J. Hatami

Research output: Contribution to conferencePosterAcademic

Abstract

This study investigates the impacts of online peer feedback supported by argumentation instruction and argumentative scripts on students’ argumentative essay writing, argumentative feedback quality and domain-specific knowledge acquisition. Participants were 52 students who were randomly divided over 26 dyads and randomly assigned to three conditions (unscripted peer feedback, instruction and worked example, scripted peer feedback). They were then asked to write and argumentative essay, to engage in argumentative peer feedback with their learning partner, and to finally revise their essay based on feedback they received. The findings indicate that the online peer feedback supported by argumentative scripts outperformed other two conditions in terms of argumentative essay writing, argumentative feedback quality and students’ learning.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 2020
Event2020 American Educational Research Association (AERA) Annual Meeting -
Duration: 17 Apr 202021 Apr 2020
https://www.aera20.net/

Conference

Conference2020 American Educational Research Association (AERA) Annual Meeting
Abbreviated titleAERA2020
Period17/04/2021/04/20
Internet address

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Impacts of Online Peer Feedback Supported by Argumentation Instruction and Argumentative Scripts on Students' Learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this