Hybrid governance for drought risk management: the case of the 2014/2015 El Niño in Costa Rica

Raffaele Vignola, Chris Kuzdas, Isabel Bolaños, Karina Poveda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the athropocene era, droughts are complex disaster risks that are driven by the nature-society interactions requiring, especially at the local scales, of adaptive poli-centric approaches. In such contexts, actors from across scales and knowledge domains need interchanging information and coordinating actions through existing institutional spaces to i) navigate uncertainties regarding complex drought evolution and impacts pathways and ii) address pre-existing social tensions over water scarcity. Focussing on the dry tropics of
Costa Rica and on the 2014/2015 El Niño drought that affected all Central
American region, this article characterizes existing institutional spaces used by stakeholders to address water scarcity in three case studies while characterizing the evolution of this drought's governance from the analysis of official and media documents. We found that in some of the case studies actors from sectors previously involved in water conflicts are not represented in inter-organizational institutional spaces to address water scarcity and have not participated in the drought response process. We also found, in line with the drought governance
analysis from around the World, that drought governance activities in the
region should strengthen the participation of representatives of organizations that can play a knowledge-brokering role such as technical agencies, local universities or extensionists. Although these boundary players can contribute to increase shared understanding among different actors in water conflict-prone cases on drivers, responsibilities and uncertainties, they are currently under-represented in local institutional spaces.
LanguageEnglish
Pages363-374
JournalInternational Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction
Volume28
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2018

Fingerprint

Costa Rica
Drought
Risk management
drought
risk management
El Nino
governance
water
Water
uncertainty
Tropics
tropics
Disasters
disaster
stakeholder
driver
responsibility
participation
university
interaction

Keywords

  • drought risk management
  • El Niño
  • water conflicts
  • hybrid governance

Cite this

@article{9fc7c040026f444884c0f323e8f5e757,
title = "Hybrid governance for drought risk management: the case of the 2014/2015 El Ni{\~n}o in Costa Rica",
abstract = "In the athropocene era, droughts are complex disaster risks that are driven by the nature-society interactions requiring, especially at the local scales, of adaptive poli-centric approaches. In such contexts, actors from across scales and knowledge domains need interchanging information and coordinating actions through existing institutional spaces to i) navigate uncertainties regarding complex drought evolution and impacts pathways and ii) address pre-existing social tensions over water scarcity. Focussing on the dry tropics ofCosta Rica and on the 2014/2015 El Ni{\~n}o drought that affected all CentralAmerican region, this article characterizes existing institutional spaces used by stakeholders to address water scarcity in three case studies while characterizing the evolution of this drought's governance from the analysis of official and media documents. We found that in some of the case studies actors from sectors previously involved in water conflicts are not represented in inter-organizational institutional spaces to address water scarcity and have not participated in the drought response process. We also found, in line with the drought governanceanalysis from around the World, that drought governance activities in theregion should strengthen the participation of representatives of organizations that can play a knowledge-brokering role such as technical agencies, local universities or extensionists. Although these boundary players can contribute to increase shared understanding among different actors in water conflict-prone cases on drivers, responsibilities and uncertainties, they are currently under-represented in local institutional spaces.",
keywords = "drought risk management, El Ni{\~n}o, water conflicts, hybrid governance",
author = "Raffaele Vignola and Chris Kuzdas and Isabel Bola{\~n}os and Karina Poveda",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.03.011",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "363--374",
journal = "International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction",
issn = "2212-4209",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Hybrid governance for drought risk management: the case of the 2014/2015 El Niño in Costa Rica. / Vignola, Raffaele; Kuzdas, Chris; Bolaños, Isabel; Poveda, Karina.

In: International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, Vol. 28, 06.2018, p. 363-374.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hybrid governance for drought risk management: the case of the 2014/2015 El Niño in Costa Rica

AU - Vignola, Raffaele

AU - Kuzdas, Chris

AU - Bolaños, Isabel

AU - Poveda, Karina

PY - 2018/6

Y1 - 2018/6

N2 - In the athropocene era, droughts are complex disaster risks that are driven by the nature-society interactions requiring, especially at the local scales, of adaptive poli-centric approaches. In such contexts, actors from across scales and knowledge domains need interchanging information and coordinating actions through existing institutional spaces to i) navigate uncertainties regarding complex drought evolution and impacts pathways and ii) address pre-existing social tensions over water scarcity. Focussing on the dry tropics ofCosta Rica and on the 2014/2015 El Niño drought that affected all CentralAmerican region, this article characterizes existing institutional spaces used by stakeholders to address water scarcity in three case studies while characterizing the evolution of this drought's governance from the analysis of official and media documents. We found that in some of the case studies actors from sectors previously involved in water conflicts are not represented in inter-organizational institutional spaces to address water scarcity and have not participated in the drought response process. We also found, in line with the drought governanceanalysis from around the World, that drought governance activities in theregion should strengthen the participation of representatives of organizations that can play a knowledge-brokering role such as technical agencies, local universities or extensionists. Although these boundary players can contribute to increase shared understanding among different actors in water conflict-prone cases on drivers, responsibilities and uncertainties, they are currently under-represented in local institutional spaces.

AB - In the athropocene era, droughts are complex disaster risks that are driven by the nature-society interactions requiring, especially at the local scales, of adaptive poli-centric approaches. In such contexts, actors from across scales and knowledge domains need interchanging information and coordinating actions through existing institutional spaces to i) navigate uncertainties regarding complex drought evolution and impacts pathways and ii) address pre-existing social tensions over water scarcity. Focussing on the dry tropics ofCosta Rica and on the 2014/2015 El Niño drought that affected all CentralAmerican region, this article characterizes existing institutional spaces used by stakeholders to address water scarcity in three case studies while characterizing the evolution of this drought's governance from the analysis of official and media documents. We found that in some of the case studies actors from sectors previously involved in water conflicts are not represented in inter-organizational institutional spaces to address water scarcity and have not participated in the drought response process. We also found, in line with the drought governanceanalysis from around the World, that drought governance activities in theregion should strengthen the participation of representatives of organizations that can play a knowledge-brokering role such as technical agencies, local universities or extensionists. Although these boundary players can contribute to increase shared understanding among different actors in water conflict-prone cases on drivers, responsibilities and uncertainties, they are currently under-represented in local institutional spaces.

KW - drought risk management

KW - El Niño

KW - water conflicts

KW - hybrid governance

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.03.011

DO - 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.03.011

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 363

EP - 374

JO - International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

T2 - International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

JF - International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

SN - 2212-4209

ER -