How uncertainties are tackled in multi-disciplinary science? A review of integrated assessments under global change

A.V. Pastor*, D.C.S. Vieira, F.H. Soudijn, O.Y. Edelenbosch

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Integrated assessment (IA) modelling can be an effective tool to gain insight into the dynamics of coupled earth system (land use, climate etc.) and socio-economic components. Quantifying and communicating uncertainties is a challenge of any scientific assessment, but is here magnified by the complex and boundary-crossing nature of IA models. Understanding the dynamics of coupled earth and socio-economic systems require data and methods from multiple disciplines, each with its own perspective on epistemological uncertainties (parametric and structural uncertainties), and its own protocols for assessing uncertainty. During the Paris Agreement, the lack of uncertainty analyses (UA) in IAs was risen (Rogelj et al. 2017) and calls for close collaboration of scientists coming from different fields. In this study, we review how uncertainties are tackled in a range of science disciplines that are related to global change including climate, hydrology, energy and land use, and which contribute to IA modelling. We conducted a meta-analysis to identify the contributing disciplines, and review which type of uncertainties are assessed. We then describe sources of uncertainty (e.g. parameter values, model structure), and present opportunities for improved assessment and communication of uncertainties in IA modelling. We show in our meta-analysis that parametric uncertainty is the uncertainty analysis that has been applied the most, while structural uncertainty is less commonly applied, with the exception of the energy scientific discipline. We finish our study with key recommendations to improve uncertainty analysis such as including risk analysis. By embracing uncertainties, resilient and effective solutions for climate change mitigation and adaptation could be better communicated, identified and implemented.

Original languageEnglish
Article number104305
JournalCatena
Volume186
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2020

Fingerprint

global change
uncertainty analysis
meta-analysis
modeling
land use
economic system
climate
energy use
hydrology
communication
energy
science
socioeconomics
recommendation
boundary crossing
parameter
risk analysis
climate change mitigation
protocol
method

Keywords

  • Climate change
  • Integrated assessment models (IAMs)
  • Land use
  • Parametric uncertainty
  • Structural uncertainty
  • Uncertainty analysis (UA)

Cite this

@article{5e905c2eb42a4432bb113005fcbe8bd9,
title = "How uncertainties are tackled in multi-disciplinary science? A review of integrated assessments under global change",
abstract = "Integrated assessment (IA) modelling can be an effective tool to gain insight into the dynamics of coupled earth system (land use, climate etc.) and socio-economic components. Quantifying and communicating uncertainties is a challenge of any scientific assessment, but is here magnified by the complex and boundary-crossing nature of IA models. Understanding the dynamics of coupled earth and socio-economic systems require data and methods from multiple disciplines, each with its own perspective on epistemological uncertainties (parametric and structural uncertainties), and its own protocols for assessing uncertainty. During the Paris Agreement, the lack of uncertainty analyses (UA) in IAs was risen (Rogelj et al. 2017) and calls for close collaboration of scientists coming from different fields. In this study, we review how uncertainties are tackled in a range of science disciplines that are related to global change including climate, hydrology, energy and land use, and which contribute to IA modelling. We conducted a meta-analysis to identify the contributing disciplines, and review which type of uncertainties are assessed. We then describe sources of uncertainty (e.g. parameter values, model structure), and present opportunities for improved assessment and communication of uncertainties in IA modelling. We show in our meta-analysis that parametric uncertainty is the uncertainty analysis that has been applied the most, while structural uncertainty is less commonly applied, with the exception of the energy scientific discipline. We finish our study with key recommendations to improve uncertainty analysis such as including risk analysis. By embracing uncertainties, resilient and effective solutions for climate change mitigation and adaptation could be better communicated, identified and implemented.",
keywords = "Climate change, Integrated assessment models (IAMs), Land use, Parametric uncertainty, Structural uncertainty, Uncertainty analysis (UA)",
author = "A.V. Pastor and D.C.S. Vieira and F.H. Soudijn and O.Y. Edelenbosch",
year = "2020",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1016/j.catena.2019.104305",
language = "English",
volume = "186",
journal = "Catena",
issn = "0341-8162",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

How uncertainties are tackled in multi-disciplinary science? A review of integrated assessments under global change. / Pastor, A.V.; Vieira, D.C.S.; Soudijn, F.H.; Edelenbosch, O.Y.

In: Catena, Vol. 186, 104305, 03.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - How uncertainties are tackled in multi-disciplinary science? A review of integrated assessments under global change

AU - Pastor, A.V.

AU - Vieira, D.C.S.

AU - Soudijn, F.H.

AU - Edelenbosch, O.Y.

PY - 2020/3

Y1 - 2020/3

N2 - Integrated assessment (IA) modelling can be an effective tool to gain insight into the dynamics of coupled earth system (land use, climate etc.) and socio-economic components. Quantifying and communicating uncertainties is a challenge of any scientific assessment, but is here magnified by the complex and boundary-crossing nature of IA models. Understanding the dynamics of coupled earth and socio-economic systems require data and methods from multiple disciplines, each with its own perspective on epistemological uncertainties (parametric and structural uncertainties), and its own protocols for assessing uncertainty. During the Paris Agreement, the lack of uncertainty analyses (UA) in IAs was risen (Rogelj et al. 2017) and calls for close collaboration of scientists coming from different fields. In this study, we review how uncertainties are tackled in a range of science disciplines that are related to global change including climate, hydrology, energy and land use, and which contribute to IA modelling. We conducted a meta-analysis to identify the contributing disciplines, and review which type of uncertainties are assessed. We then describe sources of uncertainty (e.g. parameter values, model structure), and present opportunities for improved assessment and communication of uncertainties in IA modelling. We show in our meta-analysis that parametric uncertainty is the uncertainty analysis that has been applied the most, while structural uncertainty is less commonly applied, with the exception of the energy scientific discipline. We finish our study with key recommendations to improve uncertainty analysis such as including risk analysis. By embracing uncertainties, resilient and effective solutions for climate change mitigation and adaptation could be better communicated, identified and implemented.

AB - Integrated assessment (IA) modelling can be an effective tool to gain insight into the dynamics of coupled earth system (land use, climate etc.) and socio-economic components. Quantifying and communicating uncertainties is a challenge of any scientific assessment, but is here magnified by the complex and boundary-crossing nature of IA models. Understanding the dynamics of coupled earth and socio-economic systems require data and methods from multiple disciplines, each with its own perspective on epistemological uncertainties (parametric and structural uncertainties), and its own protocols for assessing uncertainty. During the Paris Agreement, the lack of uncertainty analyses (UA) in IAs was risen (Rogelj et al. 2017) and calls for close collaboration of scientists coming from different fields. In this study, we review how uncertainties are tackled in a range of science disciplines that are related to global change including climate, hydrology, energy and land use, and which contribute to IA modelling. We conducted a meta-analysis to identify the contributing disciplines, and review which type of uncertainties are assessed. We then describe sources of uncertainty (e.g. parameter values, model structure), and present opportunities for improved assessment and communication of uncertainties in IA modelling. We show in our meta-analysis that parametric uncertainty is the uncertainty analysis that has been applied the most, while structural uncertainty is less commonly applied, with the exception of the energy scientific discipline. We finish our study with key recommendations to improve uncertainty analysis such as including risk analysis. By embracing uncertainties, resilient and effective solutions for climate change mitigation and adaptation could be better communicated, identified and implemented.

KW - Climate change

KW - Integrated assessment models (IAMs)

KW - Land use

KW - Parametric uncertainty

KW - Structural uncertainty

KW - Uncertainty analysis (UA)

U2 - 10.1016/j.catena.2019.104305

DO - 10.1016/j.catena.2019.104305

M3 - Article

VL - 186

JO - Catena

JF - Catena

SN - 0341-8162

M1 - 104305

ER -