Abstract
To tempt consumers towards more sustainable food choices, ‘intermediately’ sustainable products (i.e., in
between conventional and organic) have been introduced. This poses the managerial question how to
best position this range of products. In an experiment with intermediately sustainable meat products,
we show that the choice share of these intermediate products is high when price level and physical display
signal a consistent positioning of these products. This implies that the effect of layout depends on
the price level at which intermediately sustainable products are offered. When these products are offered
at intermediate prices, displaying them in a separate section will increase choice (i.e., unique feature
positioning). Yet, when intermediately sustainable products are offered at low prices, a mixed display
in which intermediately sustainable and conventional products are dispersed will be more effective in
increasing choice for the intermediately sustainable options (i.e., comparative positioning). These results
show the importance of assortment display in affecting the sales potential of products, and how the most
optimal display in-store depends on price level.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 26-32 |
Journal | Food Quality and Preference |
Volume | 46 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Keywords
- Compromise effect
- In-store marketing
- Positioning
- Price
- Shelf
- Sustainability