How to Advocate Scientific Evidence to Decision-makers?

Marleen Bekker (Editor), Viveka Guzman, Keitly Mensah

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstractAcademic

Abstract

Public health research aims to change the world, or at least contribute to the development of healthier and more equitable societies. However, the availability of health information does not inherently lead to its increased use in policy and decision-making. Significant gap remains between the knowledge of public health researchers and the actions taken by decision-makers. Various tools and mechanisms can help to increase the use of scientific evidence in policy development by making policymakers appreciate, understand and incorporate such scientific information into policy decisions. As part of this process, it is crucial that researchers and public health practitioners acquire the ability to translate their knowledge and become skilled on communicating the evidence effectively. To this aim, we will present firstly a WHO approach for that on the basis of EVIPNet Europe. Member countries have benefited of EVIPNet Europe’s capacity building efforts, its training workshops, coaching and mentoring schemes, leading to increased knowledge and skills in view of identifying, accessing, appraising, synthesizing and communicating the best available evidence. The presentation will focus on the ways to trigger tangible changes at policy and legislative levels. The second presentation will give more specific information about the process of real-life applications. Main question will be “How to advocate scientific evidence to decision-makers in the frame of evidence-informed policy-making?”. The presentation will help the participants to analyze to whom they are targeting, what their interests are and how to communicate scientific information to a decision-maker effectively. Last but not least, common challenges of evidence-informed policy-making process in health care and ways to tackle them will be presented. By doing so, special attention will be paid to the methodologies for joint fact-finding, responsive evaluation and citizen science. The workshop will engage participants interactively and leave time for answering their questions at the end.
Original languageEnglish
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Nov 2019
EventEuropean Public Health Conference - Marseille, France
Duration: 20 Nov 201923 Nov 2019

Conference

ConferenceEuropean Public Health Conference
CountryFrance
CityMarseille
Period20/11/1923/11/19

Fingerprint

decision maker
evidence
public health
coaching
health information
mentoring
WHO
development policy
health care
citizen
decision making
methodology
ability
science
evaluation
society

Cite this

Bekker, M. (Ed.), Guzman, V., & Mensah, K. (2019). How to Advocate Scientific Evidence to Decision-makers?. Abstract from European Public Health Conference, Marseille, France. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckz185.151
Bekker, Marleen (Editor) ; Guzman, Viveka ; Mensah, Keitly. / How to Advocate Scientific Evidence to Decision-makers?. Abstract from European Public Health Conference, Marseille, France.
@conference{41d3f24350ff40b8ab08370a949b3116,
title = "How to Advocate Scientific Evidence to Decision-makers?",
abstract = "Public health research aims to change the world, or at least contribute to the development of healthier and more equitable societies. However, the availability of health information does not inherently lead to its increased use in policy and decision-making. Significant gap remains between the knowledge of public health researchers and the actions taken by decision-makers. Various tools and mechanisms can help to increase the use of scientific evidence in policy development by making policymakers appreciate, understand and incorporate such scientific information into policy decisions. As part of this process, it is crucial that researchers and public health practitioners acquire the ability to translate their knowledge and become skilled on communicating the evidence effectively. To this aim, we will present firstly a WHO approach for that on the basis of EVIPNet Europe. Member countries have benefited of EVIPNet Europe’s capacity building efforts, its training workshops, coaching and mentoring schemes, leading to increased knowledge and skills in view of identifying, accessing, appraising, synthesizing and communicating the best available evidence. The presentation will focus on the ways to trigger tangible changes at policy and legislative levels. The second presentation will give more specific information about the process of real-life applications. Main question will be “How to advocate scientific evidence to decision-makers in the frame of evidence-informed policy-making?”. The presentation will help the participants to analyze to whom they are targeting, what their interests are and how to communicate scientific information to a decision-maker effectively. Last but not least, common challenges of evidence-informed policy-making process in health care and ways to tackle them will be presented. By doing so, special attention will be paid to the methodologies for joint fact-finding, responsive evaluation and citizen science. The workshop will engage participants interactively and leave time for answering their questions at the end.",
author = "Marleen Bekker and Viveka Guzman and Keitly Mensah",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1093/eurpub/ckz185.151",
language = "English",
note = "European Public Health Conference ; Conference date: 20-11-2019 Through 23-11-2019",

}

Bekker, M (ed.), Guzman, V & Mensah, K 2019, 'How to Advocate Scientific Evidence to Decision-makers?' European Public Health Conference, Marseille, France, 20/11/19 - 23/11/19, . https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckz185.151

How to Advocate Scientific Evidence to Decision-makers? / Bekker, Marleen (Editor); Guzman, Viveka; Mensah, Keitly.

2019. Abstract from European Public Health Conference, Marseille, France.

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstractAcademic

TY - CONF

T1 - How to Advocate Scientific Evidence to Decision-makers?

AU - Guzman, Viveka

AU - Mensah, Keitly

A2 - Bekker, Marleen

PY - 2019/11/13

Y1 - 2019/11/13

N2 - Public health research aims to change the world, or at least contribute to the development of healthier and more equitable societies. However, the availability of health information does not inherently lead to its increased use in policy and decision-making. Significant gap remains between the knowledge of public health researchers and the actions taken by decision-makers. Various tools and mechanisms can help to increase the use of scientific evidence in policy development by making policymakers appreciate, understand and incorporate such scientific information into policy decisions. As part of this process, it is crucial that researchers and public health practitioners acquire the ability to translate their knowledge and become skilled on communicating the evidence effectively. To this aim, we will present firstly a WHO approach for that on the basis of EVIPNet Europe. Member countries have benefited of EVIPNet Europe’s capacity building efforts, its training workshops, coaching and mentoring schemes, leading to increased knowledge and skills in view of identifying, accessing, appraising, synthesizing and communicating the best available evidence. The presentation will focus on the ways to trigger tangible changes at policy and legislative levels. The second presentation will give more specific information about the process of real-life applications. Main question will be “How to advocate scientific evidence to decision-makers in the frame of evidence-informed policy-making?”. The presentation will help the participants to analyze to whom they are targeting, what their interests are and how to communicate scientific information to a decision-maker effectively. Last but not least, common challenges of evidence-informed policy-making process in health care and ways to tackle them will be presented. By doing so, special attention will be paid to the methodologies for joint fact-finding, responsive evaluation and citizen science. The workshop will engage participants interactively and leave time for answering their questions at the end.

AB - Public health research aims to change the world, or at least contribute to the development of healthier and more equitable societies. However, the availability of health information does not inherently lead to its increased use in policy and decision-making. Significant gap remains between the knowledge of public health researchers and the actions taken by decision-makers. Various tools and mechanisms can help to increase the use of scientific evidence in policy development by making policymakers appreciate, understand and incorporate such scientific information into policy decisions. As part of this process, it is crucial that researchers and public health practitioners acquire the ability to translate their knowledge and become skilled on communicating the evidence effectively. To this aim, we will present firstly a WHO approach for that on the basis of EVIPNet Europe. Member countries have benefited of EVIPNet Europe’s capacity building efforts, its training workshops, coaching and mentoring schemes, leading to increased knowledge and skills in view of identifying, accessing, appraising, synthesizing and communicating the best available evidence. The presentation will focus on the ways to trigger tangible changes at policy and legislative levels. The second presentation will give more specific information about the process of real-life applications. Main question will be “How to advocate scientific evidence to decision-makers in the frame of evidence-informed policy-making?”. The presentation will help the participants to analyze to whom they are targeting, what their interests are and how to communicate scientific information to a decision-maker effectively. Last but not least, common challenges of evidence-informed policy-making process in health care and ways to tackle them will be presented. By doing so, special attention will be paid to the methodologies for joint fact-finding, responsive evaluation and citizen science. The workshop will engage participants interactively and leave time for answering their questions at the end.

U2 - 10.1093/eurpub/ckz185.151

DO - 10.1093/eurpub/ckz185.151

M3 - Abstract

ER -

Bekker M, (ed.), Guzman V, Mensah K. How to Advocate Scientific Evidence to Decision-makers?. 2019. Abstract from European Public Health Conference, Marseille, France. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckz185.151