How should we define health?

M. Huber, J.A. Knottnerus, L. Green, H. van der Horst, A.R. Jadad, D. Kromhout, B. Leonard, K. Lorig, M.I. Loureiro, J.W.M. van der Meer, P. Schnabel, R. Smith, C. van Weel, H. Smid

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialAcademicpeer-review

888 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The current WHO definition of health, formulated in 1948, describes health as “a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.” At that time this formulation was groundbreaking because of its breadth and ambition. It overcame the negative definition of health as absence of disease and included the physical, mental, and social domains. Although the definition has been criticised over the past 60 years, it has never been adapted. Criticism is now intensifying, and as populations age and the pattern of illnesses changes the definition may even be counterproductive. The paper summarises the limitations of the WHO definition and describes the proposals for making it more useful that were developed at a conference of international health experts held in the Netherlands
Original languageEnglish
Article numberd4163
Number of pages3
JournalBMJ: British Medical Journal
Volume343
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Keywords

  • disease self-management
  • trial

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'How should we define health?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this