Household inclusion in the governance of housing retrofitting: Analysing Chinese and Dutch systems of energy retrofit provision

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

One of the most important governance challenges in terms of energy saving is the physical upgrading of apartment buildings via housing retrofitting. In urban studies, little focus has been applied to the shape and character of the retrofit governance frameworks to realise inclusion of householders. Little is known about how these different frameworks, and the systems of provision they represent, impact on householders to achieve energy saving in their retrofitted houses. By recognising the importance of the relationship between provision and consumption, this study aims to analyse household inclusion in Chinese and Dutch systems of energy retrofit provision to suggest strategic improvements for intermediation. The empirical data is gathered in qualitative case studies of housing retrofitting in Amsterdam, Beijing and Mianyang (Sichuan province, China) by interviewing local retrofit providers, combined with site observations and reviews of policy documents. This paper shows how the formation of sustainable retrofit practices is co-constituted in shifting constellations of retrofit governance along the public-private-community divide. Public and private modes of housing retrofit provision seem to converge in Beijing, Mianyang and Amsterdam. The findings point to how regulations, processes and technical infrastructures should be adjusted to realise sustainable retrofit practices. The paper concludes that energy housing retrofitting in both Chinese and Dutch contexts requires co-management among householders and social intermediaries.
LanguageEnglish
Pages10-22
JournalEnergy Research & Social Science
Volume53
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Retrofitting
inclusion
housing
governance
energy
energy saving
Energy conservation
apartment building
co-management
infrastructure
regulation
China
community

Keywords

  • Housing retrofitting
  • Governance
  • Energy consumption
  • Everyday life
  • Systems of provision
  • Household-provider interactions
  • China
  • The Netherlands

Cite this

@article{72462840411a4749a86773e6d455d646,
title = "Household inclusion in the governance of housing retrofitting: Analysing Chinese and Dutch systems of energy retrofit provision",
abstract = "One of the most important governance challenges in terms of energy saving is the physical upgrading of apartment buildings via housing retrofitting. In urban studies, little focus has been applied to the shape and character of the retrofit governance frameworks to realise inclusion of householders. Little is known about how these different frameworks, and the systems of provision they represent, impact on householders to achieve energy saving in their retrofitted houses. By recognising the importance of the relationship between provision and consumption, this study aims to analyse household inclusion in Chinese and Dutch systems of energy retrofit provision to suggest strategic improvements for intermediation. The empirical data is gathered in qualitative case studies of housing retrofitting in Amsterdam, Beijing and Mianyang (Sichuan province, China) by interviewing local retrofit providers, combined with site observations and reviews of policy documents. This paper shows how the formation of sustainable retrofit practices is co-constituted in shifting constellations of retrofit governance along the public-private-community divide. Public and private modes of housing retrofit provision seem to converge in Beijing, Mianyang and Amsterdam. The findings point to how regulations, processes and technical infrastructures should be adjusted to realise sustainable retrofit practices. The paper concludes that energy housing retrofitting in both Chinese and Dutch contexts requires co-management among householders and social intermediaries.",
keywords = "Housing retrofitting, Governance, Energy consumption, Everyday life, Systems of provision, Household-provider interactions, China, The Netherlands",
author = "{de Feijter}, F.J. and {van Vliet}, B.J.M. and Y. Chen",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.006",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "10--22",
journal = "Energy Research & Social Science",
issn = "2214-6296",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Household inclusion in the governance of housing retrofitting

T2 - Energy Research & Social Science

AU - de Feijter, F.J.

AU - van Vliet, B.J.M.

AU - Chen, Y.

PY - 2019/7

Y1 - 2019/7

N2 - One of the most important governance challenges in terms of energy saving is the physical upgrading of apartment buildings via housing retrofitting. In urban studies, little focus has been applied to the shape and character of the retrofit governance frameworks to realise inclusion of householders. Little is known about how these different frameworks, and the systems of provision they represent, impact on householders to achieve energy saving in their retrofitted houses. By recognising the importance of the relationship between provision and consumption, this study aims to analyse household inclusion in Chinese and Dutch systems of energy retrofit provision to suggest strategic improvements for intermediation. The empirical data is gathered in qualitative case studies of housing retrofitting in Amsterdam, Beijing and Mianyang (Sichuan province, China) by interviewing local retrofit providers, combined with site observations and reviews of policy documents. This paper shows how the formation of sustainable retrofit practices is co-constituted in shifting constellations of retrofit governance along the public-private-community divide. Public and private modes of housing retrofit provision seem to converge in Beijing, Mianyang and Amsterdam. The findings point to how regulations, processes and technical infrastructures should be adjusted to realise sustainable retrofit practices. The paper concludes that energy housing retrofitting in both Chinese and Dutch contexts requires co-management among householders and social intermediaries.

AB - One of the most important governance challenges in terms of energy saving is the physical upgrading of apartment buildings via housing retrofitting. In urban studies, little focus has been applied to the shape and character of the retrofit governance frameworks to realise inclusion of householders. Little is known about how these different frameworks, and the systems of provision they represent, impact on householders to achieve energy saving in their retrofitted houses. By recognising the importance of the relationship between provision and consumption, this study aims to analyse household inclusion in Chinese and Dutch systems of energy retrofit provision to suggest strategic improvements for intermediation. The empirical data is gathered in qualitative case studies of housing retrofitting in Amsterdam, Beijing and Mianyang (Sichuan province, China) by interviewing local retrofit providers, combined with site observations and reviews of policy documents. This paper shows how the formation of sustainable retrofit practices is co-constituted in shifting constellations of retrofit governance along the public-private-community divide. Public and private modes of housing retrofit provision seem to converge in Beijing, Mianyang and Amsterdam. The findings point to how regulations, processes and technical infrastructures should be adjusted to realise sustainable retrofit practices. The paper concludes that energy housing retrofitting in both Chinese and Dutch contexts requires co-management among householders and social intermediaries.

KW - Housing retrofitting

KW - Governance

KW - Energy consumption

KW - Everyday life

KW - Systems of provision

KW - Household-provider interactions

KW - China

KW - The Netherlands

U2 - 10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.006

DO - 10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.006

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 10

EP - 22

JO - Energy Research & Social Science

JF - Energy Research & Social Science

SN - 2214-6296

ER -