Helping stakeholders select and apply appraisal tools to mitigate soil threats

Researchers’ experiences from across Europe

Uche T. Okpara*, Luuk Fleskens, Lindsay C. Stringer, Rudi Hessel, Felicitas Bachmann, Ioannis Daliakopoulos, Kerstin Berglund, Francisco Jose Blanco Velazquez, Nicola Dal Ferro, Jacob Keizer, Silvia Kohnova, Tatenda Lemann, Claire Quinn, Gudrun Schwilch, Grzegorz Siebielec, Kamilla Skaalsveen, Mark Tibbett, Christos Zoumides

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Soil improvement measures need to be ecologically credible, socially acceptable and economically affordable if they are to enter widespread use. However, in real world decision contexts not all measures can sufficiently meet these criteria. As such, developing, selecting and using appropriate tools to support more systematic appraisal of soil improvement measures in different decision-making contexts represents an important challenge. Tools differ in their aims, ranging from those focused on appraising issues of cost-effectiveness, wider ecosystem services impacts and adoption barriers/opportunities, to those seeking to foster participatory engagement and social learning. Despite the growing complexity of the decision-support tool landscape, comprehensive guidance for selecting tools that are best suited to appraise soil improvement measures, as well as those well-adapted to enable participatory deployment, has generally been lacking. We address this gap using the experience and survey data from an EU-funded project (RECARE: Preventing and REmediating degradation of soils in Europe through land CARE). RECARE applied different socio-cultural, biophysical and monetary appraisal tools to assess the costs, benefits and adoption of soil improvement measures across Europe. We focused on these appraisal tools and evaluated their performance against three broad attributes that gauge their differences and suitability for widespread deployment to aid stakeholder decision making in soil management. Data were collected using an online questionnaire administered to RECARE researchers. Although some tools worked better than others across case studies, the information collated was used to provide guiding strategies for choosing appropriate tools, considering resources and data availability, characterisation of uncertainty, and the purpose for which a specific soil improvement measure is being developed or promoted. This paper provides insights to others working in practical soil improvement contexts as to why getting the tools right matters. It demonstrates how use of the right tools can add value to decision-making in ameliorating soil threats, supporting the sustainable management of the services that our soil ecosystems provide.

Original languageEnglish
Article number110005
JournalJournal of Environmental Management
Volume257
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2020

Fingerprint

soil improvement
stakeholder
Soils
soil
decision making
Decision making
soil ecosystem
Ecosystems
soil management
ecosystem service
Europe
appraisal
aid
gauge
learning
Cost effectiveness
Gages
resource
cost
Availability

Keywords

  • Decision-support tools
  • Europe
  • Impact assessment
  • Soil degradation
  • Soil improvement
  • Stakeholder engagement

Cite this

Okpara, Uche T. ; Fleskens, Luuk ; Stringer, Lindsay C. ; Hessel, Rudi ; Bachmann, Felicitas ; Daliakopoulos, Ioannis ; Berglund, Kerstin ; Blanco Velazquez, Francisco Jose ; Ferro, Nicola Dal ; Keizer, Jacob ; Kohnova, Silvia ; Lemann, Tatenda ; Quinn, Claire ; Schwilch, Gudrun ; Siebielec, Grzegorz ; Skaalsveen, Kamilla ; Tibbett, Mark ; Zoumides, Christos. / Helping stakeholders select and apply appraisal tools to mitigate soil threats : Researchers’ experiences from across Europe. In: Journal of Environmental Management. 2020 ; Vol. 257.
@article{3da3b4426d994994b1ecc0f9c8c434e6,
title = "Helping stakeholders select and apply appraisal tools to mitigate soil threats: Researchers’ experiences from across Europe",
abstract = "Soil improvement measures need to be ecologically credible, socially acceptable and economically affordable if they are to enter widespread use. However, in real world decision contexts not all measures can sufficiently meet these criteria. As such, developing, selecting and using appropriate tools to support more systematic appraisal of soil improvement measures in different decision-making contexts represents an important challenge. Tools differ in their aims, ranging from those focused on appraising issues of cost-effectiveness, wider ecosystem services impacts and adoption barriers/opportunities, to those seeking to foster participatory engagement and social learning. Despite the growing complexity of the decision-support tool landscape, comprehensive guidance for selecting tools that are best suited to appraise soil improvement measures, as well as those well-adapted to enable participatory deployment, has generally been lacking. We address this gap using the experience and survey data from an EU-funded project (RECARE: Preventing and REmediating degradation of soils in Europe through land CARE). RECARE applied different socio-cultural, biophysical and monetary appraisal tools to assess the costs, benefits and adoption of soil improvement measures across Europe. We focused on these appraisal tools and evaluated their performance against three broad attributes that gauge their differences and suitability for widespread deployment to aid stakeholder decision making in soil management. Data were collected using an online questionnaire administered to RECARE researchers. Although some tools worked better than others across case studies, the information collated was used to provide guiding strategies for choosing appropriate tools, considering resources and data availability, characterisation of uncertainty, and the purpose for which a specific soil improvement measure is being developed or promoted. This paper provides insights to others working in practical soil improvement contexts as to why getting the tools right matters. It demonstrates how use of the right tools can add value to decision-making in ameliorating soil threats, supporting the sustainable management of the services that our soil ecosystems provide.",
keywords = "Decision-support tools, Europe, Impact assessment, Soil degradation, Soil improvement, Stakeholder engagement",
author = "Okpara, {Uche T.} and Luuk Fleskens and Stringer, {Lindsay C.} and Rudi Hessel and Felicitas Bachmann and Ioannis Daliakopoulos and Kerstin Berglund and {Blanco Velazquez}, {Francisco Jose} and Ferro, {Nicola Dal} and Jacob Keizer and Silvia Kohnova and Tatenda Lemann and Claire Quinn and Gudrun Schwilch and Grzegorz Siebielec and Kamilla Skaalsveen and Mark Tibbett and Christos Zoumides",
year = "2020",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.110005",
language = "English",
volume = "257",
journal = "Journal of Environmental Management",
issn = "0301-4797",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Okpara, UT, Fleskens, L, Stringer, LC, Hessel, R, Bachmann, F, Daliakopoulos, I, Berglund, K, Blanco Velazquez, FJ, Ferro, ND, Keizer, J, Kohnova, S, Lemann, T, Quinn, C, Schwilch, G, Siebielec, G, Skaalsveen, K, Tibbett, M & Zoumides, C 2020, 'Helping stakeholders select and apply appraisal tools to mitigate soil threats: Researchers’ experiences from across Europe', Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 257, 110005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.110005

Helping stakeholders select and apply appraisal tools to mitigate soil threats : Researchers’ experiences from across Europe. / Okpara, Uche T.; Fleskens, Luuk; Stringer, Lindsay C.; Hessel, Rudi; Bachmann, Felicitas; Daliakopoulos, Ioannis; Berglund, Kerstin; Blanco Velazquez, Francisco Jose; Ferro, Nicola Dal; Keizer, Jacob; Kohnova, Silvia; Lemann, Tatenda; Quinn, Claire; Schwilch, Gudrun; Siebielec, Grzegorz; Skaalsveen, Kamilla; Tibbett, Mark; Zoumides, Christos.

In: Journal of Environmental Management, Vol. 257, 110005, 01.03.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Helping stakeholders select and apply appraisal tools to mitigate soil threats

T2 - Researchers’ experiences from across Europe

AU - Okpara, Uche T.

AU - Fleskens, Luuk

AU - Stringer, Lindsay C.

AU - Hessel, Rudi

AU - Bachmann, Felicitas

AU - Daliakopoulos, Ioannis

AU - Berglund, Kerstin

AU - Blanco Velazquez, Francisco Jose

AU - Ferro, Nicola Dal

AU - Keizer, Jacob

AU - Kohnova, Silvia

AU - Lemann, Tatenda

AU - Quinn, Claire

AU - Schwilch, Gudrun

AU - Siebielec, Grzegorz

AU - Skaalsveen, Kamilla

AU - Tibbett, Mark

AU - Zoumides, Christos

PY - 2020/3/1

Y1 - 2020/3/1

N2 - Soil improvement measures need to be ecologically credible, socially acceptable and economically affordable if they are to enter widespread use. However, in real world decision contexts not all measures can sufficiently meet these criteria. As such, developing, selecting and using appropriate tools to support more systematic appraisal of soil improvement measures in different decision-making contexts represents an important challenge. Tools differ in their aims, ranging from those focused on appraising issues of cost-effectiveness, wider ecosystem services impacts and adoption barriers/opportunities, to those seeking to foster participatory engagement and social learning. Despite the growing complexity of the decision-support tool landscape, comprehensive guidance for selecting tools that are best suited to appraise soil improvement measures, as well as those well-adapted to enable participatory deployment, has generally been lacking. We address this gap using the experience and survey data from an EU-funded project (RECARE: Preventing and REmediating degradation of soils in Europe through land CARE). RECARE applied different socio-cultural, biophysical and monetary appraisal tools to assess the costs, benefits and adoption of soil improvement measures across Europe. We focused on these appraisal tools and evaluated their performance against three broad attributes that gauge their differences and suitability for widespread deployment to aid stakeholder decision making in soil management. Data were collected using an online questionnaire administered to RECARE researchers. Although some tools worked better than others across case studies, the information collated was used to provide guiding strategies for choosing appropriate tools, considering resources and data availability, characterisation of uncertainty, and the purpose for which a specific soil improvement measure is being developed or promoted. This paper provides insights to others working in practical soil improvement contexts as to why getting the tools right matters. It demonstrates how use of the right tools can add value to decision-making in ameliorating soil threats, supporting the sustainable management of the services that our soil ecosystems provide.

AB - Soil improvement measures need to be ecologically credible, socially acceptable and economically affordable if they are to enter widespread use. However, in real world decision contexts not all measures can sufficiently meet these criteria. As such, developing, selecting and using appropriate tools to support more systematic appraisal of soil improvement measures in different decision-making contexts represents an important challenge. Tools differ in their aims, ranging from those focused on appraising issues of cost-effectiveness, wider ecosystem services impacts and adoption barriers/opportunities, to those seeking to foster participatory engagement and social learning. Despite the growing complexity of the decision-support tool landscape, comprehensive guidance for selecting tools that are best suited to appraise soil improvement measures, as well as those well-adapted to enable participatory deployment, has generally been lacking. We address this gap using the experience and survey data from an EU-funded project (RECARE: Preventing and REmediating degradation of soils in Europe through land CARE). RECARE applied different socio-cultural, biophysical and monetary appraisal tools to assess the costs, benefits and adoption of soil improvement measures across Europe. We focused on these appraisal tools and evaluated their performance against three broad attributes that gauge their differences and suitability for widespread deployment to aid stakeholder decision making in soil management. Data were collected using an online questionnaire administered to RECARE researchers. Although some tools worked better than others across case studies, the information collated was used to provide guiding strategies for choosing appropriate tools, considering resources and data availability, characterisation of uncertainty, and the purpose for which a specific soil improvement measure is being developed or promoted. This paper provides insights to others working in practical soil improvement contexts as to why getting the tools right matters. It demonstrates how use of the right tools can add value to decision-making in ameliorating soil threats, supporting the sustainable management of the services that our soil ecosystems provide.

KW - Decision-support tools

KW - Europe

KW - Impact assessment

KW - Soil degradation

KW - Soil improvement

KW - Stakeholder engagement

U2 - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.110005

DO - 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.110005

M3 - Article

VL - 257

JO - Journal of Environmental Management

JF - Journal of Environmental Management

SN - 0301-4797

M1 - 110005

ER -