Greenhouse gas mitigation potential of the world’s grazing lands:: Modeling soil carbon and nitrogen fluxes of mitigation practices

Benjamin Henderson, P.J. Gerber, Tom E. hilinski, Alessandra Falcucci, D.S. Ojima, Mirella Salvatore, Richard T. Conant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study provides estimates of the net GHG mitigation potential of a selected range of management practices in the world’s native and cultivated grazing lands. The Century and Daycent models are used to calculate the changes in soil carbon stocks, soil N2O emissions, and forage removals by ruminants
associated with these practices. GLEAM is used in combination with these models to establish grazing area boundaries and to parameterize links between forage consumption, animal production and animal GHG emissions. This study provides an alternative to the usual approach of extrapolating from a small
number of field studies and by modeling the linkage between soil, forage and animals it sheds new light on the net mitigation potential of C sequestration practices in the world’s grazing lands. Three different mitigation practices are assessed in this study, namely, improved grazing management, legume sowing
and N fertilization. We estimate that optimization of grazing pressure could sequester 148 Tg CO2 yr1. The soil C sequestration potential of 203 Tg CO2 yr1 for legume sowing was higher than for improved grazing management, despite being applied over a much smaller total area. However, N2O emissions from
legumes were estimated to offset 28% of its global C sequestration benefits, in CO2 equivalent terms. Conversely, N2O emissions from N fertilization exceeded soil C sequestration, in all regions. Our estimated potential for increasing C stocks though in grazing lands is lower than earlier worldwide estimates (Smith et al., 2007; Lal, 2004), mainly due to the much smaller grazing land area over which we estimate mitigation practices to be effective. A big concern is the high risk of the practices, particularly legumes, increasing soil-based GHGs if applied outside of this relatively small effective area. More work is needed to develop indicators, based on biophysical and management characteristics of grazing lands, to identify amenable areas before these practices can be considered ready for large scale implementation. The additional ruminant GHG emissions associated with higher forage output are likely to substantially reduce the mitigation potential of these practices, but could contribute to more GHG-efficient livestock production.
LanguageEnglish
Pages91-100
JournalAgriculture, Ecosystems and Environment
Volume207
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

grazing lands
soil nitrogen
greenhouse gases
soil carbon
greenhouse gas
mitigation
grazing
carbon sequestration
forage
carbon
nitrogen
nitrous oxide
modeling
soil
grazing management
legumes
carbon dioxide
soil emission
range management
animal

Cite this

Henderson, Benjamin ; Gerber, P.J. ; hilinski, Tom E. ; Falcucci, Alessandra ; Ojima, D.S. ; Salvatore, Mirella ; Conant, Richard T. / Greenhouse gas mitigation potential of the world’s grazing lands: Modeling soil carbon and nitrogen fluxes of mitigation practices. In: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2015 ; Vol. 207. pp. 91-100.
@article{9e54ea91596e4a57b7ad3b31f5b75e30,
title = "Greenhouse gas mitigation potential of the world’s grazing lands:: Modeling soil carbon and nitrogen fluxes of mitigation practices",
abstract = "This study provides estimates of the net GHG mitigation potential of a selected range of management practices in the world’s native and cultivated grazing lands. The Century and Daycent models are used to calculate the changes in soil carbon stocks, soil N2O emissions, and forage removals by ruminantsassociated with these practices. GLEAM is used in combination with these models to establish grazing area boundaries and to parameterize links between forage consumption, animal production and animal GHG emissions. This study provides an alternative to the usual approach of extrapolating from a smallnumber of field studies and by modeling the linkage between soil, forage and animals it sheds new light on the net mitigation potential of C sequestration practices in the world’s grazing lands. Three different mitigation practices are assessed in this study, namely, improved grazing management, legume sowingand N fertilization. We estimate that optimization of grazing pressure could sequester 148 Tg CO2 yr1. The soil C sequestration potential of 203 Tg CO2 yr1 for legume sowing was higher than for improved grazing management, despite being applied over a much smaller total area. However, N2O emissions fromlegumes were estimated to offset 28{\%} of its global C sequestration benefits, in CO2 equivalent terms. Conversely, N2O emissions from N fertilization exceeded soil C sequestration, in all regions. Our estimated potential for increasing C stocks though in grazing lands is lower than earlier worldwide estimates (Smith et al., 2007; Lal, 2004), mainly due to the much smaller grazing land area over which we estimate mitigation practices to be effective. A big concern is the high risk of the practices, particularly legumes, increasing soil-based GHGs if applied outside of this relatively small effective area. More work is needed to develop indicators, based on biophysical and management characteristics of grazing lands, to identify amenable areas before these practices can be considered ready for large scale implementation. The additional ruminant GHG emissions associated with higher forage output are likely to substantially reduce the mitigation potential of these practices, but could contribute to more GHG-efficient livestock production.",
author = "Benjamin Henderson and P.J. Gerber and hilinski, {Tom E.} and Alessandra Falcucci and D.S. Ojima and Mirella Salvatore and Conant, {Richard T.}",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.agee.2015.03.029",
language = "English",
volume = "207",
pages = "91--100",
journal = "Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment",
issn = "0167-8809",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Greenhouse gas mitigation potential of the world’s grazing lands: Modeling soil carbon and nitrogen fluxes of mitigation practices. / Henderson, Benjamin; Gerber, P.J.; hilinski, Tom E.; Falcucci, Alessandra; Ojima, D.S.; Salvatore, Mirella; Conant, Richard T.

In: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, Vol. 207, 2015, p. 91-100.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Greenhouse gas mitigation potential of the world’s grazing lands:

T2 - Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

AU - Henderson, Benjamin

AU - Gerber, P.J.

AU - hilinski, Tom E.

AU - Falcucci, Alessandra

AU - Ojima, D.S.

AU - Salvatore, Mirella

AU - Conant, Richard T.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This study provides estimates of the net GHG mitigation potential of a selected range of management practices in the world’s native and cultivated grazing lands. The Century and Daycent models are used to calculate the changes in soil carbon stocks, soil N2O emissions, and forage removals by ruminantsassociated with these practices. GLEAM is used in combination with these models to establish grazing area boundaries and to parameterize links between forage consumption, animal production and animal GHG emissions. This study provides an alternative to the usual approach of extrapolating from a smallnumber of field studies and by modeling the linkage between soil, forage and animals it sheds new light on the net mitigation potential of C sequestration practices in the world’s grazing lands. Three different mitigation practices are assessed in this study, namely, improved grazing management, legume sowingand N fertilization. We estimate that optimization of grazing pressure could sequester 148 Tg CO2 yr1. The soil C sequestration potential of 203 Tg CO2 yr1 for legume sowing was higher than for improved grazing management, despite being applied over a much smaller total area. However, N2O emissions fromlegumes were estimated to offset 28% of its global C sequestration benefits, in CO2 equivalent terms. Conversely, N2O emissions from N fertilization exceeded soil C sequestration, in all regions. Our estimated potential for increasing C stocks though in grazing lands is lower than earlier worldwide estimates (Smith et al., 2007; Lal, 2004), mainly due to the much smaller grazing land area over which we estimate mitigation practices to be effective. A big concern is the high risk of the practices, particularly legumes, increasing soil-based GHGs if applied outside of this relatively small effective area. More work is needed to develop indicators, based on biophysical and management characteristics of grazing lands, to identify amenable areas before these practices can be considered ready for large scale implementation. The additional ruminant GHG emissions associated with higher forage output are likely to substantially reduce the mitigation potential of these practices, but could contribute to more GHG-efficient livestock production.

AB - This study provides estimates of the net GHG mitigation potential of a selected range of management practices in the world’s native and cultivated grazing lands. The Century and Daycent models are used to calculate the changes in soil carbon stocks, soil N2O emissions, and forage removals by ruminantsassociated with these practices. GLEAM is used in combination with these models to establish grazing area boundaries and to parameterize links between forage consumption, animal production and animal GHG emissions. This study provides an alternative to the usual approach of extrapolating from a smallnumber of field studies and by modeling the linkage between soil, forage and animals it sheds new light on the net mitigation potential of C sequestration practices in the world’s grazing lands. Three different mitigation practices are assessed in this study, namely, improved grazing management, legume sowingand N fertilization. We estimate that optimization of grazing pressure could sequester 148 Tg CO2 yr1. The soil C sequestration potential of 203 Tg CO2 yr1 for legume sowing was higher than for improved grazing management, despite being applied over a much smaller total area. However, N2O emissions fromlegumes were estimated to offset 28% of its global C sequestration benefits, in CO2 equivalent terms. Conversely, N2O emissions from N fertilization exceeded soil C sequestration, in all regions. Our estimated potential for increasing C stocks though in grazing lands is lower than earlier worldwide estimates (Smith et al., 2007; Lal, 2004), mainly due to the much smaller grazing land area over which we estimate mitigation practices to be effective. A big concern is the high risk of the practices, particularly legumes, increasing soil-based GHGs if applied outside of this relatively small effective area. More work is needed to develop indicators, based on biophysical and management characteristics of grazing lands, to identify amenable areas before these practices can be considered ready for large scale implementation. The additional ruminant GHG emissions associated with higher forage output are likely to substantially reduce the mitigation potential of these practices, but could contribute to more GHG-efficient livestock production.

U2 - 10.1016/j.agee.2015.03.029

DO - 10.1016/j.agee.2015.03.029

M3 - Article

VL - 207

SP - 91

EP - 100

JO - Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

JF - Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

SN - 0167-8809

ER -