Governing by expertise

the contested politics of (accounting for) land-based mitigation in a new climate agreement

Kate Dooley, Aarti Gupta*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article analyzes the contested politics of including (and accounting for) land-based mitigation in a post-2020 climate agreement. Emissions from land have been only partially included to date within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and its Kyoto Protocol. The Paris Agreement, adopted in December 2015 and “applicable to all” for the post-2020 period, raises the possibility of unprecedented reliance on land-based mitigation. This has significant consequences for furthering both ambition and equity in global climate mitigation efforts. Yet, what are these consequences, and how have they manifested themselves in the existing (pre-2020) multilateral climate regime? What role do accounting rules for land-based mitigation play herein? In addressing these questions, we identify key dimensions of what we term the “governance by expertise” approach taken to land-based mitigation to date, which has served to reduce the environmental integrity of existing (developed country) mitigation efforts. Specifically, we analyze land-use accounting rules as a site of politics and highlight the “technicalization of politics” underway in this realm, which obscures the political implications of how land has been included to date. We conclude by considering whether the Paris Agreement institutionalizes similar dynamics, and the environmental integrity and equity implications of doing so.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)483-500
JournalInternational Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

expertise
climate
politics
integrity
equity
Kyoto Protocol
Expertise
Mitigation
Climate
UNO
climate change
land use
governance
Integrity
Equity

Keywords

  • Accounting
  • Climate governance
  • Equity
  • Land-based mitigation
  • Land-use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF)
  • Negative emissions
  • Paris Agreement
  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)

Cite this

@article{fa09c162ebfa4439ac30f31ecf0e84c6,
title = "Governing by expertise: the contested politics of (accounting for) land-based mitigation in a new climate agreement",
abstract = "This article analyzes the contested politics of including (and accounting for) land-based mitigation in a post-2020 climate agreement. Emissions from land have been only partially included to date within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and its Kyoto Protocol. The Paris Agreement, adopted in December 2015 and “applicable to all” for the post-2020 period, raises the possibility of unprecedented reliance on land-based mitigation. This has significant consequences for furthering both ambition and equity in global climate mitigation efforts. Yet, what are these consequences, and how have they manifested themselves in the existing (pre-2020) multilateral climate regime? What role do accounting rules for land-based mitigation play herein? In addressing these questions, we identify key dimensions of what we term the “governance by expertise” approach taken to land-based mitigation to date, which has served to reduce the environmental integrity of existing (developed country) mitigation efforts. Specifically, we analyze land-use accounting rules as a site of politics and highlight the “technicalization of politics” underway in this realm, which obscures the political implications of how land has been included to date. We conclude by considering whether the Paris Agreement institutionalizes similar dynamics, and the environmental integrity and equity implications of doing so.",
keywords = "Accounting, Climate governance, Equity, Land-based mitigation, Land-use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF), Negative emissions, Paris Agreement, United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)",
author = "Kate Dooley and Aarti Gupta",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1007/s10784-016-9331-z",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "483--500",
journal = "International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics",
issn = "1567-9764",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "4",

}

Governing by expertise : the contested politics of (accounting for) land-based mitigation in a new climate agreement. / Dooley, Kate; Gupta, Aarti.

In: International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Vol. 17, No. 4, 2017, p. 483-500.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Governing by expertise

T2 - the contested politics of (accounting for) land-based mitigation in a new climate agreement

AU - Dooley, Kate

AU - Gupta, Aarti

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This article analyzes the contested politics of including (and accounting for) land-based mitigation in a post-2020 climate agreement. Emissions from land have been only partially included to date within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and its Kyoto Protocol. The Paris Agreement, adopted in December 2015 and “applicable to all” for the post-2020 period, raises the possibility of unprecedented reliance on land-based mitigation. This has significant consequences for furthering both ambition and equity in global climate mitigation efforts. Yet, what are these consequences, and how have they manifested themselves in the existing (pre-2020) multilateral climate regime? What role do accounting rules for land-based mitigation play herein? In addressing these questions, we identify key dimensions of what we term the “governance by expertise” approach taken to land-based mitigation to date, which has served to reduce the environmental integrity of existing (developed country) mitigation efforts. Specifically, we analyze land-use accounting rules as a site of politics and highlight the “technicalization of politics” underway in this realm, which obscures the political implications of how land has been included to date. We conclude by considering whether the Paris Agreement institutionalizes similar dynamics, and the environmental integrity and equity implications of doing so.

AB - This article analyzes the contested politics of including (and accounting for) land-based mitigation in a post-2020 climate agreement. Emissions from land have been only partially included to date within the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and its Kyoto Protocol. The Paris Agreement, adopted in December 2015 and “applicable to all” for the post-2020 period, raises the possibility of unprecedented reliance on land-based mitigation. This has significant consequences for furthering both ambition and equity in global climate mitigation efforts. Yet, what are these consequences, and how have they manifested themselves in the existing (pre-2020) multilateral climate regime? What role do accounting rules for land-based mitigation play herein? In addressing these questions, we identify key dimensions of what we term the “governance by expertise” approach taken to land-based mitigation to date, which has served to reduce the environmental integrity of existing (developed country) mitigation efforts. Specifically, we analyze land-use accounting rules as a site of politics and highlight the “technicalization of politics” underway in this realm, which obscures the political implications of how land has been included to date. We conclude by considering whether the Paris Agreement institutionalizes similar dynamics, and the environmental integrity and equity implications of doing so.

KW - Accounting

KW - Climate governance

KW - Equity

KW - Land-based mitigation

KW - Land-use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF)

KW - Negative emissions

KW - Paris Agreement

KW - United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)

U2 - 10.1007/s10784-016-9331-z

DO - 10.1007/s10784-016-9331-z

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 483

EP - 500

JO - International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics

JF - International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics

SN - 1567-9764

IS - 4

ER -