Global variation in diabetes diagnosis and prevalence based on fasting glucose and hemoglobin A1c

Bin Zhou, Kate E. Sheffer, James E. Bennett, Edward W. Gregg, Goodarz Danaei, Rosie K. Singleton, Jonathan E. Shaw, Anu Mishra, Victor P.F. Lhoste, Rodrigo M. Carrillo-Larco, Andre P. Kengne, Nowell H. Phelps, Rachel A. Heap, Archie W. Rayner, Gretchen A. Stevens, Chris J. Paciorek, Leanne M. Riley, Melanie J. Cowan, Stefan Savin, Stephen Vander HoornYuan Lu, Meda E. Pavkov, Giuseppina Imperatore, Carlos A. Aguilar-Salinas, Noor Ani Ahmad, Ranjit Mohan Anjana, Kairat Davletov, Farshad Farzadfar, Clicerio González-Villalpando, Young Ho Khang, Hyeon Chang Kim, Tiina Laatikainen, Avula Laxmaiah, Jean Claude N. Mbanya, K.M.V. Narayan, Ambady Ramachandran, Alisha N. Wade, Tomasz Zdrojewski, Mohsen Abbasi-Kangevari, Hanan F. Abdul Rahim, Niveen M. Abu-Rmeileh, Shalkar Adambekov, Robert J. Adams, Wichai Aekplakorn, Imelda A. Agdeppa, Javad Aghazadeh-Attari, Charles Agyemang, Edith J.M. Feskens, Majid Ezzati*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) are both used to diagnose diabetes, but these measurements can identify different people as having diabetes. We used data from 117 population-based studies and quantified, in different world regions, the prevalence of diagnosed diabetes, and whether those who were previously undiagnosed and detected as having diabetes in survey screening, had elevated FPG, HbA1c or both. We developed prediction equations for estimating the probability that a person without previously diagnosed diabetes, and at a specific level of FPG, had elevated HbA1c, and vice versa. The age-standardized proportion of diabetes that was previously undiagnosed and detected in survey screening ranged from 30% in the high-income western region to 66% in south Asia. Among those with screen-detected diabetes with either test, the age-standardized proportion who had elevated levels of both FPG and HbA1c was 29–39% across regions; the remainder had discordant elevation of FPG or HbA1c. In most low- and middle-income regions, isolated elevated HbA1c was more common than isolated elevated FPG. In these regions, the use of FPG alone may delay diabetes diagnosis and underestimate diabetes prevalence. Our prediction equations help allocate finite resources for measuring HbA1c to reduce the global shortfall in diabetes diagnosis and surveillance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2885-2901
Number of pages17
JournalNature Medicine
Volume29
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Nov 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Global variation in diabetes diagnosis and prevalence based on fasting glucose and hemoglobin A1c'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this