Global Standards and Benefit Sharing among Russian and Transnational Oil Companies on Sakhalin Island

S. Tulaeva, M. Tysyachnyouk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademic

Abstract

This article compares benefit sharing arrangements set up between indigenous people and Russian and transnational oil companies. It demonstrates that Russian oil companies interact with indigenous communities in a paternalistic way, while transnational consortiums, operated by Sakhalin Energy and Exxon Neftegaz Limited, use the partnership mode of benefit sharing. Typically, both kinds of firms set up tripartite partnerships involving companies, indigenous peoples and the state. The paternalistic model of benefit sharing overall provides few opportunities for indigenous peoples to participate in the distribution of funds, and thereby offers little procedural equity. In terms of distributional equity, it is hard to compare Russian companies with their transnational counterparts as the different companies cover different aspects of indigenous
peoples’ well being. Russian companies are involved mostly in building social infrastructure, while transnational firms support indigenous entrepreneurship and the revitalization of indigenous subsistence lifestyle, languages and cultures.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)10-14
JournalRussian Analytical Digest
Issue number202
Publication statusPublished - 28 Apr 2017

Fingerprint

equity
firm
social infrastructure
entrepreneurship
well-being
energy
language
community

Cite this

@article{e4b66e9fd80f4b6dacff5855e615c0fd,
title = "Global Standards and Benefit Sharing among Russian and Transnational Oil Companies on Sakhalin Island",
abstract = "This article compares benefit sharing arrangements set up between indigenous people and Russian and transnational oil companies. It demonstrates that Russian oil companies interact with indigenous communities in a paternalistic way, while transnational consortiums, operated by Sakhalin Energy and Exxon Neftegaz Limited, use the partnership mode of benefit sharing. Typically, both kinds of firms set up tripartite partnerships involving companies, indigenous peoples and the state. The paternalistic model of benefit sharing overall provides few opportunities for indigenous peoples to participate in the distribution of funds, and thereby offers little procedural equity. In terms of distributional equity, it is hard to compare Russian companies with their transnational counterparts as the different companies cover different aspects of indigenouspeoples’ well being. Russian companies are involved mostly in building social infrastructure, while transnational firms support indigenous entrepreneurship and the revitalization of indigenous subsistence lifestyle, languages and cultures.",
author = "S. Tulaeva and M. Tysyachnyouk",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "28",
language = "English",
pages = "10--14",
journal = "Russian Analytical Digest",
issn = "1863-0421",
number = "202",

}

Global Standards and Benefit Sharing among Russian and Transnational Oil Companies on Sakhalin Island. / Tulaeva, S.; Tysyachnyouk, M.

In: Russian Analytical Digest, No. 202, 28.04.2017, p. 10-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademic

TY - JOUR

T1 - Global Standards and Benefit Sharing among Russian and Transnational Oil Companies on Sakhalin Island

AU - Tulaeva, S.

AU - Tysyachnyouk, M.

PY - 2017/4/28

Y1 - 2017/4/28

N2 - This article compares benefit sharing arrangements set up between indigenous people and Russian and transnational oil companies. It demonstrates that Russian oil companies interact with indigenous communities in a paternalistic way, while transnational consortiums, operated by Sakhalin Energy and Exxon Neftegaz Limited, use the partnership mode of benefit sharing. Typically, both kinds of firms set up tripartite partnerships involving companies, indigenous peoples and the state. The paternalistic model of benefit sharing overall provides few opportunities for indigenous peoples to participate in the distribution of funds, and thereby offers little procedural equity. In terms of distributional equity, it is hard to compare Russian companies with their transnational counterparts as the different companies cover different aspects of indigenouspeoples’ well being. Russian companies are involved mostly in building social infrastructure, while transnational firms support indigenous entrepreneurship and the revitalization of indigenous subsistence lifestyle, languages and cultures.

AB - This article compares benefit sharing arrangements set up between indigenous people and Russian and transnational oil companies. It demonstrates that Russian oil companies interact with indigenous communities in a paternalistic way, while transnational consortiums, operated by Sakhalin Energy and Exxon Neftegaz Limited, use the partnership mode of benefit sharing. Typically, both kinds of firms set up tripartite partnerships involving companies, indigenous peoples and the state. The paternalistic model of benefit sharing overall provides few opportunities for indigenous peoples to participate in the distribution of funds, and thereby offers little procedural equity. In terms of distributional equity, it is hard to compare Russian companies with their transnational counterparts as the different companies cover different aspects of indigenouspeoples’ well being. Russian companies are involved mostly in building social infrastructure, while transnational firms support indigenous entrepreneurship and the revitalization of indigenous subsistence lifestyle, languages and cultures.

M3 - Article

SP - 10

EP - 14

JO - Russian Analytical Digest

JF - Russian Analytical Digest

SN - 1863-0421

IS - 202

ER -