Generation of Campylobacter jejuni genetic diversity in vivo

P. de Boer, J.A. Wagenaar, R.P. Achterberg, J.P.M. van Putten, L.M. Schouls, B. Duim

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

    130 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Molecular epidemiology studies suggest that horizontal genetic exchange is a major cause of pathogen biodiversity. We tested this concept for the bacterial enteropathogen Campylobacter jejuni by seeking direct in vivo evidence for the exchange of genetic material among Campylobacter strains. For this purpose, two antibiotic resistance markers were inserted into the hipO or htrA gene of genetically distinct and naturally transformable C. jejuni strains. Genetic exchange of the resistance markers was analysed after co-cultivation of homologous and heterologous strains in vitro and in vivo during experimental infection of chickens. Double-resistant recombinants were obtained both in vitro and from the chicken intestine for all combinations of strains tested. Bidirectional genetic exchange of DNA between homologous and heterologous strains was confirmed by Southern blotting in combination with flaA polymerase chain reaction–restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR–RFLP), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). Extensive PFGE analyses of isolated recombinants indicated the frequent occurrence of genetic rearrangements during the experimental infection, in addition to the homologous recombination of the antibiotic resistance genes. Together, the data indicate unequivocally that interstrain genetic exchange as well as intragenomic alterations do occur in vivo during C. jejuni infection. These events probably explain the genome plasticity observed for this pathogen.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)351-359
    JournalMolecular Microbiology
    Volume44
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2002

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Generation of Campylobacter jejuni genetic diversity in vivo'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this