GABLS 3 SCM intercomparison and evaluation. What did we learn?

F.C. Bosveld, P. Baas, G.J. Steeneveld, A.A.M. Holtslag

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference paperAcademic

Abstract

A weakly stable case is selected from the Cabauw long term archive. The case is used for an evaluation and intercomparison of nineteen SCM in the context of the GEWEX Atmospheric Boundary Layer studies. Care was taken to prescribe realistic geostrophic forcing and dynamic tendencies to the SCM’s. It is shown that in this way a direct evaluation of SCM runs with observations is feasible. The results are analyzed using a method which allows the interpretation of differences among models in terms of the dominating physical processes in the stable boundary layer, i.e. coupling to the soil, turbulent mixing and long wave radiation. Significant differences among models are found in the representation of these three processes. It is shown that on a single case basis, atmospheric forcings as obtained from a state of the art 3D atmospheric model are not accurate enough to drive the case if a direct comparison with observations is desired. Ensemble and composite approaches are applied on the basis of eight comparable nights, showing that deviations in the forcings between the model and the real-world are diminished to such extent that a very accurate comparison between models and observations becomes feasible. As a by-product, it is shown that systematic dynamical tendencies remain in the composite case, probably related to the presence of the sea.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the Workshop on Diurnal cycles and the stable boundary layer, 7-10 November 2011, Reading, UK
PublisherEuropean Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts
Pages91-102
Publication statusPublished - 2012
EventWorkshop on Diurnal cycles and the stable boundary layer, Reading, UK -
Duration: 7 Nov 201110 Nov 2011

Workshop

WorkshopWorkshop on Diurnal cycles and the stable boundary layer, Reading, UK
Period7/11/1110/11/11

Fingerprint

boundary layer
atmospheric forcing
turbulent mixing
longwave radiation
evaluation
soil
comparison
by-product
state of the art
atmospheric model
physical process
sea
method

Cite this

Bosveld, F. C., Baas, P., Steeneveld, G. J., & Holtslag, A. A. M. (2012). GABLS 3 SCM intercomparison and evaluation. What did we learn? In Proceedings of the Workshop on Diurnal cycles and the stable boundary layer, 7-10 November 2011, Reading, UK (pp. 91-102). European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts.
Bosveld, F.C. ; Baas, P. ; Steeneveld, G.J. ; Holtslag, A.A.M. / GABLS 3 SCM intercomparison and evaluation. What did we learn?. Proceedings of the Workshop on Diurnal cycles and the stable boundary layer, 7-10 November 2011, Reading, UK. European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, 2012. pp. 91-102
@inproceedings{5fbc8c79cbbe45a38fb43c24a87067fb,
title = "GABLS 3 SCM intercomparison and evaluation. What did we learn?",
abstract = "A weakly stable case is selected from the Cabauw long term archive. The case is used for an evaluation and intercomparison of nineteen SCM in the context of the GEWEX Atmospheric Boundary Layer studies. Care was taken to prescribe realistic geostrophic forcing and dynamic tendencies to the SCM’s. It is shown that in this way a direct evaluation of SCM runs with observations is feasible. The results are analyzed using a method which allows the interpretation of differences among models in terms of the dominating physical processes in the stable boundary layer, i.e. coupling to the soil, turbulent mixing and long wave radiation. Significant differences among models are found in the representation of these three processes. It is shown that on a single case basis, atmospheric forcings as obtained from a state of the art 3D atmospheric model are not accurate enough to drive the case if a direct comparison with observations is desired. Ensemble and composite approaches are applied on the basis of eight comparable nights, showing that deviations in the forcings between the model and the real-world are diminished to such extent that a very accurate comparison between models and observations becomes feasible. As a by-product, it is shown that systematic dynamical tendencies remain in the composite case, probably related to the presence of the sea.",
author = "F.C. Bosveld and P. Baas and G.J. Steeneveld and A.A.M. Holtslag",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
pages = "91--102",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the Workshop on Diurnal cycles and the stable boundary layer, 7-10 November 2011, Reading, UK",
publisher = "European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts",

}

Bosveld, FC, Baas, P, Steeneveld, GJ & Holtslag, AAM 2012, GABLS 3 SCM intercomparison and evaluation. What did we learn? in Proceedings of the Workshop on Diurnal cycles and the stable boundary layer, 7-10 November 2011, Reading, UK. European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, pp. 91-102, Workshop on Diurnal cycles and the stable boundary layer, Reading, UK, 7/11/11.

GABLS 3 SCM intercomparison and evaluation. What did we learn? / Bosveld, F.C.; Baas, P.; Steeneveld, G.J.; Holtslag, A.A.M.

Proceedings of the Workshop on Diurnal cycles and the stable boundary layer, 7-10 November 2011, Reading, UK. European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, 2012. p. 91-102.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference paperAcademic

TY - GEN

T1 - GABLS 3 SCM intercomparison and evaluation. What did we learn?

AU - Bosveld, F.C.

AU - Baas, P.

AU - Steeneveld, G.J.

AU - Holtslag, A.A.M.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - A weakly stable case is selected from the Cabauw long term archive. The case is used for an evaluation and intercomparison of nineteen SCM in the context of the GEWEX Atmospheric Boundary Layer studies. Care was taken to prescribe realistic geostrophic forcing and dynamic tendencies to the SCM’s. It is shown that in this way a direct evaluation of SCM runs with observations is feasible. The results are analyzed using a method which allows the interpretation of differences among models in terms of the dominating physical processes in the stable boundary layer, i.e. coupling to the soil, turbulent mixing and long wave radiation. Significant differences among models are found in the representation of these three processes. It is shown that on a single case basis, atmospheric forcings as obtained from a state of the art 3D atmospheric model are not accurate enough to drive the case if a direct comparison with observations is desired. Ensemble and composite approaches are applied on the basis of eight comparable nights, showing that deviations in the forcings between the model and the real-world are diminished to such extent that a very accurate comparison between models and observations becomes feasible. As a by-product, it is shown that systematic dynamical tendencies remain in the composite case, probably related to the presence of the sea.

AB - A weakly stable case is selected from the Cabauw long term archive. The case is used for an evaluation and intercomparison of nineteen SCM in the context of the GEWEX Atmospheric Boundary Layer studies. Care was taken to prescribe realistic geostrophic forcing and dynamic tendencies to the SCM’s. It is shown that in this way a direct evaluation of SCM runs with observations is feasible. The results are analyzed using a method which allows the interpretation of differences among models in terms of the dominating physical processes in the stable boundary layer, i.e. coupling to the soil, turbulent mixing and long wave radiation. Significant differences among models are found in the representation of these three processes. It is shown that on a single case basis, atmospheric forcings as obtained from a state of the art 3D atmospheric model are not accurate enough to drive the case if a direct comparison with observations is desired. Ensemble and composite approaches are applied on the basis of eight comparable nights, showing that deviations in the forcings between the model and the real-world are diminished to such extent that a very accurate comparison between models and observations becomes feasible. As a by-product, it is shown that systematic dynamical tendencies remain in the composite case, probably related to the presence of the sea.

M3 - Conference paper

SP - 91

EP - 102

BT - Proceedings of the Workshop on Diurnal cycles and the stable boundary layer, 7-10 November 2011, Reading, UK

PB - European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts

ER -

Bosveld FC, Baas P, Steeneveld GJ, Holtslag AAM. GABLS 3 SCM intercomparison and evaluation. What did we learn? In Proceedings of the Workshop on Diurnal cycles and the stable boundary layer, 7-10 November 2011, Reading, UK. European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts. 2012. p. 91-102