Future directions for conservation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The use of target baselines or reference states for conservation and restoration has become increasingly problematic and impractical, due to rapid environmental change, the paradigm shift in ecology from a static to a dynamic view of nature, and growing awareness of the role of cultural traditions in the reconstruction of baselines. The various responses to this crisis of baselines will to a significant extent determine the future direction of nature conservation. Although some hold onto traditional baselines and others try to refine or redefine the reference concept, the debate is currently dominated by two widely diverging reactions to the crisis: while the so-called ‘new environmentalists’ or ‘new conservationists’ declare the whole baseline notion obsolete, replacing a backward-looking approach with a forward-looking one, the ‘re-wilders’ push the baseline back to a deeper, more distant past. This article provides a critical assessment of the debate on these conversation options, with a special focus on the differences between Old World and New World perspectives.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)385-407
JournalEnvironmental Values
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

cultural tradition
paradigm shift
nature conservation
environmental change
ecology
world
restoration
Conservation
Restoration
Ecology
Cultural Tradition
Paradigm Shift
Nature Conservation
Environmental Change
Nature
National Archives

Keywords

  • Anthropocene
  • Conservation baselines
  • Novel ecosystems
  • Old world and New world perspectives
  • Rewilding

Cite this

Keulartz, Jozef. / Future directions for conservation. In: Environmental Values. 2016 ; Vol. 25, No. 4. pp. 385-407.
@article{3d949a7aca814d769b2d8041c1f792b0,
title = "Future directions for conservation",
abstract = "The use of target baselines or reference states for conservation and restoration has become increasingly problematic and impractical, due to rapid environmental change, the paradigm shift in ecology from a static to a dynamic view of nature, and growing awareness of the role of cultural traditions in the reconstruction of baselines. The various responses to this crisis of baselines will to a significant extent determine the future direction of nature conservation. Although some hold onto traditional baselines and others try to refine or redefine the reference concept, the debate is currently dominated by two widely diverging reactions to the crisis: while the so-called ‘new environmentalists’ or ‘new conservationists’ declare the whole baseline notion obsolete, replacing a backward-looking approach with a forward-looking one, the ‘re-wilders’ push the baseline back to a deeper, more distant past. This article provides a critical assessment of the debate on these conversation options, with a special focus on the differences between Old World and New World perspectives.",
keywords = "Anthropocene, Conservation baselines, Novel ecosystems, Old world and New world perspectives, Rewilding",
author = "Jozef Keulartz",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.3197/096327116X14661540759115",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "385--407",
journal = "Environmental Values",
issn = "0963-2719",
publisher = "White Horse Press",
number = "4",

}

Future directions for conservation. / Keulartz, Jozef.

In: Environmental Values, Vol. 25, No. 4, 2016, p. 385-407.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Future directions for conservation

AU - Keulartz, Jozef

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The use of target baselines or reference states for conservation and restoration has become increasingly problematic and impractical, due to rapid environmental change, the paradigm shift in ecology from a static to a dynamic view of nature, and growing awareness of the role of cultural traditions in the reconstruction of baselines. The various responses to this crisis of baselines will to a significant extent determine the future direction of nature conservation. Although some hold onto traditional baselines and others try to refine or redefine the reference concept, the debate is currently dominated by two widely diverging reactions to the crisis: while the so-called ‘new environmentalists’ or ‘new conservationists’ declare the whole baseline notion obsolete, replacing a backward-looking approach with a forward-looking one, the ‘re-wilders’ push the baseline back to a deeper, more distant past. This article provides a critical assessment of the debate on these conversation options, with a special focus on the differences between Old World and New World perspectives.

AB - The use of target baselines or reference states for conservation and restoration has become increasingly problematic and impractical, due to rapid environmental change, the paradigm shift in ecology from a static to a dynamic view of nature, and growing awareness of the role of cultural traditions in the reconstruction of baselines. The various responses to this crisis of baselines will to a significant extent determine the future direction of nature conservation. Although some hold onto traditional baselines and others try to refine or redefine the reference concept, the debate is currently dominated by two widely diverging reactions to the crisis: while the so-called ‘new environmentalists’ or ‘new conservationists’ declare the whole baseline notion obsolete, replacing a backward-looking approach with a forward-looking one, the ‘re-wilders’ push the baseline back to a deeper, more distant past. This article provides a critical assessment of the debate on these conversation options, with a special focus on the differences between Old World and New World perspectives.

KW - Anthropocene

KW - Conservation baselines

KW - Novel ecosystems

KW - Old world and New world perspectives

KW - Rewilding

U2 - 10.3197/096327116X14661540759115

DO - 10.3197/096327116X14661540759115

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 385

EP - 407

JO - Environmental Values

JF - Environmental Values

SN - 0963-2719

IS - 4

ER -