From conflict to resilience? Explaining recent changes in climate security discourse and practice

I.J.C. Boas, Delf Rothe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The recent rise of resilience thinking in climate security discourse and practice is examined and explained. Using the paradigmatic case of the United Kingdom, practitioners’ understandings of resilience are considered to show how these actors use a resilience lens to rearticulate earlier storylines of climate conflict in terms of complexity, decentralisation, and empowerment. Practitioners in the climate security field tend to reinterpret resilience in line with their established routines. As a result, climate resilience storylines and practices turn out to be much more diverse and messy than is suggested in the conceptual literature. Building on these findings, the recent success of resilience thinking in climate security discourse is explained. Climate resilience – not despite but due to its messiness – is able to bring together a wide range of actors, traditionally standing at opposite ends of the climate security debate. Through resilience storylines, climate security discourse becomes something to which a wide range of actors, ranging from security to the development field, can relate.
LanguageEnglish
Pages613-632
JournalEnvironmental Politics
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

resilience
climate
discourse
conflict
empowerment
decentralization

Keywords

  • resilience
  • climate politics
  • climate security
  • discourse analysis
  • United Kingdom

Cite this

@article{6a2c7ee4321d4614a69d996fb220ab05,
title = "From conflict to resilience? Explaining recent changes in climate security discourse and practice",
abstract = "The recent rise of resilience thinking in climate security discourse and practice is examined and explained. Using the paradigmatic case of the United Kingdom, practitioners’ understandings of resilience are considered to show how these actors use a resilience lens to rearticulate earlier storylines of climate conflict in terms of complexity, decentralisation, and empowerment. Practitioners in the climate security field tend to reinterpret resilience in line with their established routines. As a result, climate resilience storylines and practices turn out to be much more diverse and messy than is suggested in the conceptual literature. Building on these findings, the recent success of resilience thinking in climate security discourse is explained. Climate resilience – not despite but due to its messiness – is able to bring together a wide range of actors, traditionally standing at opposite ends of the climate security debate. Through resilience storylines, climate security discourse becomes something to which a wide range of actors, ranging from security to the development field, can relate.",
keywords = "resilience, climate politics, climate security, discourse analysis, United Kingdom",
author = "I.J.C. Boas and Delf Rothe",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/09644016.2016.1160479",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "613--632",
journal = "Environmental Politics",
issn = "0964-4016",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "4",

}

From conflict to resilience? Explaining recent changes in climate security discourse and practice. / Boas, I.J.C.; Rothe, Delf.

In: Environmental Politics, Vol. 25, No. 4, 2016, p. 613-632.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - From conflict to resilience? Explaining recent changes in climate security discourse and practice

AU - Boas, I.J.C.

AU - Rothe, Delf

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The recent rise of resilience thinking in climate security discourse and practice is examined and explained. Using the paradigmatic case of the United Kingdom, practitioners’ understandings of resilience are considered to show how these actors use a resilience lens to rearticulate earlier storylines of climate conflict in terms of complexity, decentralisation, and empowerment. Practitioners in the climate security field tend to reinterpret resilience in line with their established routines. As a result, climate resilience storylines and practices turn out to be much more diverse and messy than is suggested in the conceptual literature. Building on these findings, the recent success of resilience thinking in climate security discourse is explained. Climate resilience – not despite but due to its messiness – is able to bring together a wide range of actors, traditionally standing at opposite ends of the climate security debate. Through resilience storylines, climate security discourse becomes something to which a wide range of actors, ranging from security to the development field, can relate.

AB - The recent rise of resilience thinking in climate security discourse and practice is examined and explained. Using the paradigmatic case of the United Kingdom, practitioners’ understandings of resilience are considered to show how these actors use a resilience lens to rearticulate earlier storylines of climate conflict in terms of complexity, decentralisation, and empowerment. Practitioners in the climate security field tend to reinterpret resilience in line with their established routines. As a result, climate resilience storylines and practices turn out to be much more diverse and messy than is suggested in the conceptual literature. Building on these findings, the recent success of resilience thinking in climate security discourse is explained. Climate resilience – not despite but due to its messiness – is able to bring together a wide range of actors, traditionally standing at opposite ends of the climate security debate. Through resilience storylines, climate security discourse becomes something to which a wide range of actors, ranging from security to the development field, can relate.

KW - resilience

KW - climate politics

KW - climate security

KW - discourse analysis

KW - United Kingdom

U2 - 10.1080/09644016.2016.1160479

DO - 10.1080/09644016.2016.1160479

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 613

EP - 632

JO - Environmental Politics

T2 - Environmental Politics

JF - Environmental Politics

SN - 0964-4016

IS - 4

ER -