Fraud vulnerability in the Dutch milk supply chain: Assessments of farmers, processors and retailers

Y. Yang, W. Huisman, K.A. Hettinga, N. Liu, J. Heck, G.H. Schrijver, L. Gaiardoni, S.M. van Ruth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Food fraud surfaces regularly, anywhere in the world. Not only the companies involved in food fraud suffer from losses when food fraud occurs, other actors in the supply chain and branch of industry are often painted with the same brush. Milk has been a common fraud target in the past and, therefore, fraud is a concern for companies involved in milk production. In order to manage and prevent fraud in the milk supply chain, a good insight into the vulnerabilities of companies and their supply chain networks is pivotal. The aim of the current study is to understand (a) the fraud vulnerability of the general milk supply chain in the Netherlands and its tiers (farmers, processors, retailers) and (b) the differences in fraud vulnerability of farmers producing organic milk, green intermediate ‘pasture milk’ and conventional milk. The SSAFE food fraud assessment tool was slightly adapted to the milk supply chain and used to examine the fraud vulnerability of the 38 businesses of the three tiers in the study: 30 farmers, 4 milk processors and 4 retailers. Forty-eight fraud factors related to opportunities, motivations and control measures were examined. Subsequently, key fraud factors were identified. The three tier groups showed major similarities in motivation related fraud factors, and large differences in fraud opportunities and controls. There were also differences observed between the organic and non-organic farmers, with organic farmers being slightly more vulnerable than their non-organic counterparts. From this study it appears that the milk supply chain in the Netherlands is low to medium vulnerable to fraud but the key factors contributing to the vulnerability differ between the tiers (farmers, processors, retailers). Management of the fraud risks requires consideration of these differences.

LanguageEnglish
Pages308-317
JournalFood Control
Volume95
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

fraud
Fraud
supply chain
Milk
farmers
milk
Food
Farmers
Netherlands
food loss
Risk Management

Keywords

  • Dairy supply chain
  • Fraud factor
  • Fraud mitigation
  • Milk adulteration
  • Organic farm
  • Vulnerability assessment

Cite this

@article{40663ffdcbc247f3aa6bba8e9534e161,
title = "Fraud vulnerability in the Dutch milk supply chain: Assessments of farmers, processors and retailers",
abstract = "Food fraud surfaces regularly, anywhere in the world. Not only the companies involved in food fraud suffer from losses when food fraud occurs, other actors in the supply chain and branch of industry are often painted with the same brush. Milk has been a common fraud target in the past and, therefore, fraud is a concern for companies involved in milk production. In order to manage and prevent fraud in the milk supply chain, a good insight into the vulnerabilities of companies and their supply chain networks is pivotal. The aim of the current study is to understand (a) the fraud vulnerability of the general milk supply chain in the Netherlands and its tiers (farmers, processors, retailers) and (b) the differences in fraud vulnerability of farmers producing organic milk, green intermediate ‘pasture milk’ and conventional milk. The SSAFE food fraud assessment tool was slightly adapted to the milk supply chain and used to examine the fraud vulnerability of the 38 businesses of the three tiers in the study: 30 farmers, 4 milk processors and 4 retailers. Forty-eight fraud factors related to opportunities, motivations and control measures were examined. Subsequently, key fraud factors were identified. The three tier groups showed major similarities in motivation related fraud factors, and large differences in fraud opportunities and controls. There were also differences observed between the organic and non-organic farmers, with organic farmers being slightly more vulnerable than their non-organic counterparts. From this study it appears that the milk supply chain in the Netherlands is low to medium vulnerable to fraud but the key factors contributing to the vulnerability differ between the tiers (farmers, processors, retailers). Management of the fraud risks requires consideration of these differences.",
keywords = "Dairy supply chain, Fraud factor, Fraud mitigation, Milk adulteration, Organic farm, Vulnerability assessment",
author = "Y. Yang and W. Huisman and K.A. Hettinga and N. Liu and J. Heck and G.H. Schrijver and L. Gaiardoni and {van Ruth}, S.M.",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.08.019",
language = "English",
volume = "95",
pages = "308--317",
journal = "Food Control",
issn = "0956-7135",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Fraud vulnerability in the Dutch milk supply chain : Assessments of farmers, processors and retailers. / Yang, Y.; Huisman, W.; Hettinga, K.A.; Liu, N.; Heck, J.; Schrijver, G.H.; Gaiardoni, L.; van Ruth, S.M.

In: Food Control, Vol. 95, 01.01.2019, p. 308-317.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fraud vulnerability in the Dutch milk supply chain

T2 - Food Control

AU - Yang, Y.

AU - Huisman, W.

AU - Hettinga, K.A.

AU - Liu, N.

AU - Heck, J.

AU - Schrijver, G.H.

AU - Gaiardoni, L.

AU - van Ruth, S.M.

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Food fraud surfaces regularly, anywhere in the world. Not only the companies involved in food fraud suffer from losses when food fraud occurs, other actors in the supply chain and branch of industry are often painted with the same brush. Milk has been a common fraud target in the past and, therefore, fraud is a concern for companies involved in milk production. In order to manage and prevent fraud in the milk supply chain, a good insight into the vulnerabilities of companies and their supply chain networks is pivotal. The aim of the current study is to understand (a) the fraud vulnerability of the general milk supply chain in the Netherlands and its tiers (farmers, processors, retailers) and (b) the differences in fraud vulnerability of farmers producing organic milk, green intermediate ‘pasture milk’ and conventional milk. The SSAFE food fraud assessment tool was slightly adapted to the milk supply chain and used to examine the fraud vulnerability of the 38 businesses of the three tiers in the study: 30 farmers, 4 milk processors and 4 retailers. Forty-eight fraud factors related to opportunities, motivations and control measures were examined. Subsequently, key fraud factors were identified. The three tier groups showed major similarities in motivation related fraud factors, and large differences in fraud opportunities and controls. There were also differences observed between the organic and non-organic farmers, with organic farmers being slightly more vulnerable than their non-organic counterparts. From this study it appears that the milk supply chain in the Netherlands is low to medium vulnerable to fraud but the key factors contributing to the vulnerability differ between the tiers (farmers, processors, retailers). Management of the fraud risks requires consideration of these differences.

AB - Food fraud surfaces regularly, anywhere in the world. Not only the companies involved in food fraud suffer from losses when food fraud occurs, other actors in the supply chain and branch of industry are often painted with the same brush. Milk has been a common fraud target in the past and, therefore, fraud is a concern for companies involved in milk production. In order to manage and prevent fraud in the milk supply chain, a good insight into the vulnerabilities of companies and their supply chain networks is pivotal. The aim of the current study is to understand (a) the fraud vulnerability of the general milk supply chain in the Netherlands and its tiers (farmers, processors, retailers) and (b) the differences in fraud vulnerability of farmers producing organic milk, green intermediate ‘pasture milk’ and conventional milk. The SSAFE food fraud assessment tool was slightly adapted to the milk supply chain and used to examine the fraud vulnerability of the 38 businesses of the three tiers in the study: 30 farmers, 4 milk processors and 4 retailers. Forty-eight fraud factors related to opportunities, motivations and control measures were examined. Subsequently, key fraud factors were identified. The three tier groups showed major similarities in motivation related fraud factors, and large differences in fraud opportunities and controls. There were also differences observed between the organic and non-organic farmers, with organic farmers being slightly more vulnerable than their non-organic counterparts. From this study it appears that the milk supply chain in the Netherlands is low to medium vulnerable to fraud but the key factors contributing to the vulnerability differ between the tiers (farmers, processors, retailers). Management of the fraud risks requires consideration of these differences.

KW - Dairy supply chain

KW - Fraud factor

KW - Fraud mitigation

KW - Milk adulteration

KW - Organic farm

KW - Vulnerability assessment

U2 - 10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.08.019

DO - 10.1016/j.foodcont.2018.08.019

M3 - Article

VL - 95

SP - 308

EP - 317

JO - Food Control

JF - Food Control

SN - 0956-7135

ER -