Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Flooded by jargon: how the interpretation of water-related terms differs between hydrology experts and the general audience

  • G.J. Venhuizen
  • , Rolf Hut*
  • , Casper Albers
  • , C.R. Stoof
  • , Ionica Smeets
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Communication about hydrology-induced hazards is important, in order to keep the impact of floods, droughts et cetera as low as possible. However, sometimes the boundary between specialized and non-specialized language can be vague. Therefore, a close scrutiny of the use of hydrological vocabulary by both experts and laypeople is necessary. In this study, we compare the expert and lay definitions of 12 common water-related terms and 10 water-related pictures to see where misunderstandings might arise both in text and pictures. Our primary objective is to analyze the degree of agreement between experts and laypeople in their definition of the used terms. In this way, we hope to contribute to improving the communication between these groups in the future. Our study was based on a survey completed by 34 experts and 119 laypeople. Especially concerning the definition of water-related words there are some profound differences between experts and laypeople: words like river and river basin turn out to have a thoroughly different interpretation between the two groups. Concerning the pictures, there is much more agreement between the groups.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)393-403
JournalHydrology and Earth System Sciences
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 22 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Flooded by jargon: how the interpretation of water-related terms differs between hydrology experts and the general audience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this