Fertilizer use should not be a fourth principle to define conservation. Response to the opinion paper of Vanlauwe et al. (2014)

R. Sommer, C. Thierfelder, P.A. Tittonell, L. Hove, J. Mureithi, S. Mkomwa

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › Academic › peer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)145-148
JournalField Crops Research
Volume169
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Keywords

  • zea-mays l.
  • soil quality
  • residue management
  • southern africa
  • ecological intensification
  • water relations
  • systems
  • maize
  • tillage
  • yield

Cite this

Sommer, R. ; Thierfelder, C. ; Tittonell, P.A. ; Hove, L. ; Mureithi, J. ; Mkomwa, S. / Fertilizer use should not be a fourth principle to define conservation. Response to the opinion paper of Vanlauwe et al. (2014). In: Field Crops Research. 2014 ; Vol. 169. pp. 145-148.
@article{e53be9b4e23c4ad982a7ad6985bee02b,
title = "Fertilizer use should not be a fourth principle to define conservation. Response to the opinion paper of Vanlauwe et al. (2014)",
keywords = "zea-mays l., soil quality, residue management, southern africa, ecological intensification, water relations, systems, maize, tillage, yield",
author = "R. Sommer and C. Thierfelder and P.A. Tittonell and L. Hove and J. Mureithi and S. Mkomwa",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1016/j.fcr.2014.05.012",
language = "English",
volume = "169",
pages = "145--148",
journal = "Field Crops Research",
issn = "0378-4290",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Sommer, R, Thierfelder, C, Tittonell, PA, Hove, L, Mureithi, J & Mkomwa, S 2014, 'Fertilizer use should not be a fourth principle to define conservation. Response to the opinion paper of Vanlauwe et al. (2014)', Field Crops Research, vol. 169, pp. 145-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.05.012

Fertilizer use should not be a fourth principle to define conservation. Response to the opinion paper of Vanlauwe et al. (2014). / Sommer, R.; Thierfelder, C.; Tittonell, P.A.; Hove, L.; Mureithi, J.; Mkomwa, S.

In: Field Crops Research, Vol. 169, 2014, p. 145-148.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial › Academic › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fertilizer use should not be a fourth principle to define conservation. Response to the opinion paper of Vanlauwe et al. (2014)

AU - Sommer, R.

AU - Thierfelder, C.

AU - Tittonell, P.A.

AU - Hove, L.

AU - Mureithi, J.

AU - Mkomwa, S.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

KW - zea-mays l.

KW - soil quality

KW - residue management

KW - southern africa

KW - ecological intensification

KW - water relations

KW - systems

KW - maize

KW - tillage

KW - yield

U2 - 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.05.012

DO - 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.05.012

M3 - Editorial

VL - 169

SP - 145

EP - 148

JO - Field Crops Research

JF - Field Crops Research

SN - 0378-4290

ER -

Sommer R, Thierfelder C, Tittonell PA, Hove L, Mureithi J, Mkomwa S. Fertilizer use should not be a fourth principle to define conservation. Response to the opinion paper of Vanlauwe et al. (2014). Field Crops Research. 2014;169:145-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.05.012

Access to Document