Farewell to Fallacies (and Welcome Back!)

Eugen Popa*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Fallacies are traditionally defined as potentially deceptive failures of rationality or reasonableness. Fallacy theories seek to model this failure by formulating standards of rationality or reasonableness that arguers must observe when engaging in argumentative interaction. Yet it remains relatively easy to reject or avoid fallacy judgments even in the most clear-cut cases. In this article, I argue for a pluralist approach to criticism in which the fallacy accusation is only the starting point for a more complex form of criticism. In a pluralist approach, the identification of fallacies works as a first step precisely because it can be so easily set aside. In doing so, the evaluator seeks other evaluative angles that depart from the original one. As a case in point, I exemplify the approach on a piece of argumentative discourse in the scientific context. I conclude by spelling out some of the methodological consequences of the present approach.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)397-420
JournalPhilosophy & Rhetoric
Volume54
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2021

Keywords

  • Agonism
  • Bicameral thinking
  • Fallacies
  • Normativity
  • Pluralism
  • Reasonableness

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Farewell to Fallacies (and Welcome Back!)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this