Fairly efficient, efficiently fair: Lessons from designing and testing payment schemes for ecosystem services in Asia

B. Leimona*, M. van Noordwijk, J.C.J. Groot, R. Leemans

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

95 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Paymentforecosystemservices(PES)iscommonlydefined asamarket-basedenvironmentalpolicy instrument toefficiently achieveecosystemservicesprovision.However,anincreasingbodyofliterature showsthatthisprescriptiveconceptualizationofPEScannotbeeasilygeneralizedandimplementedin practice, andthatthecommodification ofecosystemservices(ES)isproblematicandmayleadtounfair situations forrelevantPESactors.ThispapersynthesizescasestudiesinIndonesia,thePhilippinesand Nepal toprovideempiricalobservationsonemergingPESmechanismsinAsia.Lessonslearnedshow that fairnessandefficiency objectivesmustbeachievedsimultaneouslyindesigningandimplementing a sustainablePESscheme,especiallyindevelopingcountrycontexts.Neitherfairnessnorefficiency isa primary aimbutanintermediate ‘fairlyefficient andefficiently fair’ PES maybridgethegapbetweenPES theory andpracticetoincreasesustainableESprovisionandimprovelivelihoods.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)16-28
JournalEcosystem Services
Volume12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Keywords

  • pacific decadal oscillation
  • normalized burn ratio
  • western united-states
  • climate-change
  • interior alaska
  • north-america
  • landsat data
  • new-mexico
  • vegetation
  • area

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fairly efficient, efficiently fair: Lessons from designing and testing payment schemes for ecosystem services in Asia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this