Abstract
Paymentforecosystemservices(PES)iscommonlydefined asamarket-basedenvironmentalpolicy
instrument toefficiently achieveecosystemservicesprovision.However,anincreasingbodyofliterature
showsthatthisprescriptiveconceptualizationofPEScannotbeeasilygeneralizedandimplementedin
practice, andthatthecommodification ofecosystemservices(ES)isproblematicandmayleadtounfair
situations forrelevantPESactors.ThispapersynthesizescasestudiesinIndonesia,thePhilippinesand
Nepal toprovideempiricalobservationsonemergingPESmechanismsinAsia.Lessonslearnedshow
that fairnessandefficiency objectivesmustbeachievedsimultaneouslyindesigningandimplementing
a sustainablePESscheme,especiallyindevelopingcountrycontexts.Neitherfairnessnorefficiency isa
primary aimbutanintermediate ‘fairlyefficient andefficiently fair’ PES maybridgethegapbetweenPES
theory andpracticetoincreasesustainableESprovisionandimprovelivelihoods.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 16-28 |
Journal | Ecosystem Services |
Volume | 12 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Keywords
- pacific decadal oscillation
- normalized burn ratio
- western united-states
- climate-change
- interior alaska
- north-america
- landsat data
- new-mexico
- vegetation
- area