Exploring spatial indicators for biodiversity accounting

Roy P. Remme, Lars Hein, Chris A.M. van Swaay

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the context of the System for Environmental-Economic Accounting, biodiversity accounting is being developed as a tool to monitor and increase the understanding of human impacts on biodiversity. Biodiversity accounting aims to structurally measure, monitor and map changes in multiple biodiversity components, as an integral part of a larger system of ecosystem accounts. Both indicators relevant for ecosystem functioning and indicators that reflect the non-use values of biodiversity can be included in biodiversity accounting. In this paper we focus on the latter, and we test the potential applicability of a set of species indicators for developing a biodiversity account in Limburg province, the Netherlands. In particular, we map and analyse a range of indicators reflecting species richness, the presence of rare and threatened species and species diversity. We test spatial correlation to identify the minimum set of indicators that would need to be included in the account. We also evaluate individual indicators using eight different criteria. We show that, in Limburg province, a set of indicators covering at least five species groups is required, and that it would be most meaningful to have indicators reflecting the occurrence of threatened species. However, data availability as well as the most suitable set of indicators are likely to differ between areas, and case studies in other countries are required to support the selection of indicators for biodiversity accounting in an international framework.

LanguageEnglish
Pages232-248
JournalEcological Indicators
Volume70
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

biodiversity
threatened species
indicator species
species diversity
environmental economics
accounting
indicator
Biodiversity
ecosystems
monitoring
ecosystem
anthropogenic activities
Netherlands
anthropogenic effect
testing
case studies
species richness

Keywords

  • Biodiversity indicators
  • Criteria
  • Ecosystem accounting
  • Monitoring
  • SEEA-EEA
  • Spatial analysis

Cite this

Remme, Roy P. ; Hein, Lars ; van Swaay, Chris A.M. / Exploring spatial indicators for biodiversity accounting. In: Ecological Indicators. 2016 ; Vol. 70. pp. 232-248.
@article{47a1f90b5ef24e90af65b87e14eedd2a,
title = "Exploring spatial indicators for biodiversity accounting",
abstract = "In the context of the System for Environmental-Economic Accounting, biodiversity accounting is being developed as a tool to monitor and increase the understanding of human impacts on biodiversity. Biodiversity accounting aims to structurally measure, monitor and map changes in multiple biodiversity components, as an integral part of a larger system of ecosystem accounts. Both indicators relevant for ecosystem functioning and indicators that reflect the non-use values of biodiversity can be included in biodiversity accounting. In this paper we focus on the latter, and we test the potential applicability of a set of species indicators for developing a biodiversity account in Limburg province, the Netherlands. In particular, we map and analyse a range of indicators reflecting species richness, the presence of rare and threatened species and species diversity. We test spatial correlation to identify the minimum set of indicators that would need to be included in the account. We also evaluate individual indicators using eight different criteria. We show that, in Limburg province, a set of indicators covering at least five species groups is required, and that it would be most meaningful to have indicators reflecting the occurrence of threatened species. However, data availability as well as the most suitable set of indicators are likely to differ between areas, and case studies in other countries are required to support the selection of indicators for biodiversity accounting in an international framework.",
keywords = "Biodiversity indicators, Criteria, Ecosystem accounting, Monitoring, SEEA-EEA, Spatial analysis",
author = "Remme, {Roy P.} and Lars Hein and {van Swaay}, {Chris A.M.}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.024",
language = "English",
volume = "70",
pages = "232--248",
journal = "Ecological Indicators",
issn = "1470-160X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Exploring spatial indicators for biodiversity accounting. / Remme, Roy P.; Hein, Lars; van Swaay, Chris A.M.

In: Ecological Indicators, Vol. 70, 2016, p. 232-248.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exploring spatial indicators for biodiversity accounting

AU - Remme, Roy P.

AU - Hein, Lars

AU - van Swaay, Chris A.M.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - In the context of the System for Environmental-Economic Accounting, biodiversity accounting is being developed as a tool to monitor and increase the understanding of human impacts on biodiversity. Biodiversity accounting aims to structurally measure, monitor and map changes in multiple biodiversity components, as an integral part of a larger system of ecosystem accounts. Both indicators relevant for ecosystem functioning and indicators that reflect the non-use values of biodiversity can be included in biodiversity accounting. In this paper we focus on the latter, and we test the potential applicability of a set of species indicators for developing a biodiversity account in Limburg province, the Netherlands. In particular, we map and analyse a range of indicators reflecting species richness, the presence of rare and threatened species and species diversity. We test spatial correlation to identify the minimum set of indicators that would need to be included in the account. We also evaluate individual indicators using eight different criteria. We show that, in Limburg province, a set of indicators covering at least five species groups is required, and that it would be most meaningful to have indicators reflecting the occurrence of threatened species. However, data availability as well as the most suitable set of indicators are likely to differ between areas, and case studies in other countries are required to support the selection of indicators for biodiversity accounting in an international framework.

AB - In the context of the System for Environmental-Economic Accounting, biodiversity accounting is being developed as a tool to monitor and increase the understanding of human impacts on biodiversity. Biodiversity accounting aims to structurally measure, monitor and map changes in multiple biodiversity components, as an integral part of a larger system of ecosystem accounts. Both indicators relevant for ecosystem functioning and indicators that reflect the non-use values of biodiversity can be included in biodiversity accounting. In this paper we focus on the latter, and we test the potential applicability of a set of species indicators for developing a biodiversity account in Limburg province, the Netherlands. In particular, we map and analyse a range of indicators reflecting species richness, the presence of rare and threatened species and species diversity. We test spatial correlation to identify the minimum set of indicators that would need to be included in the account. We also evaluate individual indicators using eight different criteria. We show that, in Limburg province, a set of indicators covering at least five species groups is required, and that it would be most meaningful to have indicators reflecting the occurrence of threatened species. However, data availability as well as the most suitable set of indicators are likely to differ between areas, and case studies in other countries are required to support the selection of indicators for biodiversity accounting in an international framework.

KW - Biodiversity indicators

KW - Criteria

KW - Ecosystem accounting

KW - Monitoring

KW - SEEA-EEA

KW - Spatial analysis

U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.024

DO - 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.024

M3 - Article

VL - 70

SP - 232

EP - 248

JO - Ecological Indicators

T2 - Ecological Indicators

JF - Ecological Indicators

SN - 1470-160X

ER -