TY - JOUR
T1 - Explaining through causal mechanisms
T2 - resilience and governance of social–ecological systems
AU - Biesbroek, Robbert
AU - Dupuis, Johann
AU - Wellstead, Adam
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - This paper synthesizes and builds on recent critiques of the resilience literature; namely that the field has largely been unsuccessful in capturing the complexity of governance processes, in particular cause–effects relationships. We demonstrate that absence of a causal model is reflected in the black-boxing of governance processes which is problematic for resilience studies with explanatory ambitions. We introduce mechanism-based thinking as alternative research perspective that offers more analytical rigour and elaborate the key principles of this approach. Mechanism-based approaches are aligned to the ways of thinking in systems theory and complexity sciences and can be used to advance scientific inquiry and policy practice to govern complex sustainability issues.
AB - This paper synthesizes and builds on recent critiques of the resilience literature; namely that the field has largely been unsuccessful in capturing the complexity of governance processes, in particular cause–effects relationships. We demonstrate that absence of a causal model is reflected in the black-boxing of governance processes which is problematic for resilience studies with explanatory ambitions. We introduce mechanism-based thinking as alternative research perspective that offers more analytical rigour and elaborate the key principles of this approach. Mechanism-based approaches are aligned to the ways of thinking in systems theory and complexity sciences and can be used to advance scientific inquiry and policy practice to govern complex sustainability issues.
U2 - 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.08.007
DO - 10.1016/j.cosust.2017.08.007
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85028941729
SN - 1877-3435
VL - 28
SP - 64
EP - 70
JO - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
JF - Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
ER -