TY - JOUR
T1 - Examining the legitimacy of inclusive innovation processes
T2 - perspectives from smallholder farmers in Uasin Gishu, Kenya
AU - Opola, Felix Ouko
AU - Klerkx, Laurens
AU - Leeuwis, Cees
AU - Kilelu, Catherine W.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - In recent decades, the concept of inclusive innovation has been used to refer to how innovation can include actors that are considered marginalised from its processes and outcomes. Contrary to the ‘expert-driven’ approaches prevalent in evaluating the legitimacy of such processes, this paper examines the legitimacy of inclusive innovation from the perspective of smallholder farmers with little resource endowments in Uasin Gishu, Kenya, that are targeted with various agricultural innovation interventions. Findings indicate that procedural aspects of legitimacy, such as including farmers as co-innovators and including their knowledge and skills in agricultural innovation processes, are an important criterion used by targeted farmers to accord legitimacy to such interventions. We also find that such interventions need to be stable over time to be legitimate to the intended beneficiaries. These criteria used by targeted actors can be an important addition to evaluation procedures and methods for inclusive innovation.
AB - In recent decades, the concept of inclusive innovation has been used to refer to how innovation can include actors that are considered marginalised from its processes and outcomes. Contrary to the ‘expert-driven’ approaches prevalent in evaluating the legitimacy of such processes, this paper examines the legitimacy of inclusive innovation from the perspective of smallholder farmers with little resource endowments in Uasin Gishu, Kenya, that are targeted with various agricultural innovation interventions. Findings indicate that procedural aspects of legitimacy, such as including farmers as co-innovators and including their knowledge and skills in agricultural innovation processes, are an important criterion used by targeted farmers to accord legitimacy to such interventions. We also find that such interventions need to be stable over time to be legitimate to the intended beneficiaries. These criteria used by targeted actors can be an important addition to evaluation procedures and methods for inclusive innovation.
KW - agricultural development
KW - epistemic justice
KW - Inclusive innovation
KW - responsible innovation
KW - rural Kenya
KW - smallholder farmers
U2 - 10.1080/23299460.2023.2258631
DO - 10.1080/23299460.2023.2258631
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85173485887
SN - 2329-9460
VL - 10
JO - Journal of Responsible Innovation
JF - Journal of Responsible Innovation
IS - 1
M1 - 2258631
ER -