“Everyone may think whatever they like, but scientists . . .”: Or how and to what end plant scientists manage the science-society relationship

K. Mogendorff, H. te Molder, B. Gremmen, C. van Woerkum

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study, the authors examine the performative functions of scientists’ discursive constructions of the science-society relationship. They use discursive psychology to analyze interviews with Dutch plant scientists and show that interviewees contrast the freedom of people in the private sphere with scientists’ responsibilities in the professional sphere to regulate “lay” access to science. To accomplish this, interviewees make claims about the scientific value of lay views only after they have displayed their tolerance of these views. Additionally, many interviewees refer to their own lay status in everyday life. Finally, the relationship between findings and recent science communication approaches is discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)727-751
JournalScience Communication
Volume34
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Keywords

  • public engagement
  • knowledge
  • discourse
  • biotechnology
  • food
  • lay
  • controversy
  • experts
  • people
  • media

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '“Everyone may think whatever they like, but scientists . . .”: Or how and to what end plant scientists manage the science-society relationship'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this