Abstract
This paper presents a theoretical framework
that can be used to discuss the question of how context,
time and different participatory process designs influence
the results of participatory monitoring projects in terms of
concrete outputs (such as sustainability indicators) and the
more intangible social outcomes (such as learning and
stakeholder relations). We will discuss and compare four
different cases of participatory monitoring of provincial
sustainable development in the Netherlands. The results
show sustainability issues selected by the stakeholders
reflect the socio-economic and ecological structural characteristics
of their region. In a different context, stakeholders
not only assign different weights to the same set of
issues, but more importantly they select a completely different
set of regional aims altogether. Since these regional
structural characteristics only change slowly over time, the
influence of time on stakeholder preferences is shown to be
only of minor importance. However, the dissipation of
learning effects is shown to be a fundamental challenge for
the cyclical nature of participatory monitoring, especially
when its goal is shared agenda building. Another important
conclusion is that, in the design of participatory processes,
more attention should be devoted to providing stakeholders
with the opportunity to comment on an ‘intermediate’
product.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 805-815 |
| Journal | Regional Environmental Change |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
Keywords
- mechanisms
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of stakeholder participation in monitoring regional sustainable development'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver