Evaluation of ecosystem-based marine management strategies based on risk assessment

G.J. Piet, R.H. Jongbloed, A.M. Knights, J.E. Tamis, A.J. Paijmans, M.T. van der Sluis, P. de Vries, L.A. Robinson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive and generic framework that provides a typology for the identification and selection of consistently defined ecosystem-based management measures and allows a coherent evaluation of these measures based on their performance to achieve policy objectives. The performance is expressed in terms of their reduction of risk of an adverse impact on the marine ecosystem. This typology consists of two interlinked aspects of a measure, i.e. the “Focus” and the “Type”. The “Focus” is determined by the part of the impact chain (Driver–Pressure–State) the measure is supposed to mitigate or counteract. The “Type” represents the physical measure itself in terms of how it affects the impact chain directly; we distinguish Spatio-temporal distribution controls, Input and Output controls, Remediation and Restoration measures. The performance of these measures in terms of their reduction in risk of adverse impacts was assessed based on an explicit consideration of three time horizons: past, present and future. Application of the framework in an integrated management strategy evaluation of a suite of measures, shows that depending on the time horizon, different measures perform best. “Past” points to measures targeting persistent pressures (e.g. marine litter) from past activities. “Present” favors measures targeting a driver (e.g. fisheries) that has a high likelihood of causing adverse impacts. “Future” involves impacts that both have a high likelihood of an adverse impact, as well as a long time to return to pre-impacted condition after the implementation of appropriate management, e.g. those caused by permanent infrastructure or persistent pressures such as marine litter or specific types of pollution.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)158-166
JournalBiological Conservation
Volume186
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

risk reduction
risk assessment
typology
targeting
ecosystems
ecosystem
ecosystem management
litter
remediation
infrastructure
pollution
fisheries
marine ecosystem
temporal distribution
fishery
evaluation
marine ecosystems

Keywords

  • fisheries management
  • new-zealand
  • vulnerability
  • support
  • areas
  • south
  • pressure
  • context
  • threats
  • number

Cite this

Piet, G.J. ; Jongbloed, R.H. ; Knights, A.M. ; Tamis, J.E. ; Paijmans, A.J. ; van der Sluis, M.T. ; de Vries, P. ; Robinson, L.A. / Evaluation of ecosystem-based marine management strategies based on risk assessment. In: Biological Conservation. 2015 ; Vol. 186. pp. 158-166.
@article{01a99adc46c44503aaedf3ccc3df5e0e,
title = "Evaluation of ecosystem-based marine management strategies based on risk assessment",
abstract = "This study presents a comprehensive and generic framework that provides a typology for the identification and selection of consistently defined ecosystem-based management measures and allows a coherent evaluation of these measures based on their performance to achieve policy objectives. The performance is expressed in terms of their reduction of risk of an adverse impact on the marine ecosystem. This typology consists of two interlinked aspects of a measure, i.e. the “Focus” and the “Type”. The “Focus” is determined by the part of the impact chain (Driver–Pressure–State) the measure is supposed to mitigate or counteract. The “Type” represents the physical measure itself in terms of how it affects the impact chain directly; we distinguish Spatio-temporal distribution controls, Input and Output controls, Remediation and Restoration measures. The performance of these measures in terms of their reduction in risk of adverse impacts was assessed based on an explicit consideration of three time horizons: past, present and future. Application of the framework in an integrated management strategy evaluation of a suite of measures, shows that depending on the time horizon, different measures perform best. “Past” points to measures targeting persistent pressures (e.g. marine litter) from past activities. “Present” favors measures targeting a driver (e.g. fisheries) that has a high likelihood of causing adverse impacts. “Future” involves impacts that both have a high likelihood of an adverse impact, as well as a long time to return to pre-impacted condition after the implementation of appropriate management, e.g. those caused by permanent infrastructure or persistent pressures such as marine litter or specific types of pollution.",
keywords = "fisheries management, new-zealand, vulnerability, support, areas, south, pressure, context, threats, number",
author = "G.J. Piet and R.H. Jongbloed and A.M. Knights and J.E. Tamis and A.J. Paijmans and {van der Sluis}, M.T. and {de Vries}, P. and L.A. Robinson",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.biocon.2015.03.011",
language = "English",
volume = "186",
pages = "158--166",
journal = "Biological Conservation",
issn = "0006-3207",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Evaluation of ecosystem-based marine management strategies based on risk assessment. / Piet, G.J.; Jongbloed, R.H.; Knights, A.M.; Tamis, J.E.; Paijmans, A.J.; van der Sluis, M.T.; de Vries, P.; Robinson, L.A.

In: Biological Conservation, Vol. 186, 2015, p. 158-166.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of ecosystem-based marine management strategies based on risk assessment

AU - Piet, G.J.

AU - Jongbloed, R.H.

AU - Knights, A.M.

AU - Tamis, J.E.

AU - Paijmans, A.J.

AU - van der Sluis, M.T.

AU - de Vries, P.

AU - Robinson, L.A.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This study presents a comprehensive and generic framework that provides a typology for the identification and selection of consistently defined ecosystem-based management measures and allows a coherent evaluation of these measures based on their performance to achieve policy objectives. The performance is expressed in terms of their reduction of risk of an adverse impact on the marine ecosystem. This typology consists of two interlinked aspects of a measure, i.e. the “Focus” and the “Type”. The “Focus” is determined by the part of the impact chain (Driver–Pressure–State) the measure is supposed to mitigate or counteract. The “Type” represents the physical measure itself in terms of how it affects the impact chain directly; we distinguish Spatio-temporal distribution controls, Input and Output controls, Remediation and Restoration measures. The performance of these measures in terms of their reduction in risk of adverse impacts was assessed based on an explicit consideration of three time horizons: past, present and future. Application of the framework in an integrated management strategy evaluation of a suite of measures, shows that depending on the time horizon, different measures perform best. “Past” points to measures targeting persistent pressures (e.g. marine litter) from past activities. “Present” favors measures targeting a driver (e.g. fisheries) that has a high likelihood of causing adverse impacts. “Future” involves impacts that both have a high likelihood of an adverse impact, as well as a long time to return to pre-impacted condition after the implementation of appropriate management, e.g. those caused by permanent infrastructure or persistent pressures such as marine litter or specific types of pollution.

AB - This study presents a comprehensive and generic framework that provides a typology for the identification and selection of consistently defined ecosystem-based management measures and allows a coherent evaluation of these measures based on their performance to achieve policy objectives. The performance is expressed in terms of their reduction of risk of an adverse impact on the marine ecosystem. This typology consists of two interlinked aspects of a measure, i.e. the “Focus” and the “Type”. The “Focus” is determined by the part of the impact chain (Driver–Pressure–State) the measure is supposed to mitigate or counteract. The “Type” represents the physical measure itself in terms of how it affects the impact chain directly; we distinguish Spatio-temporal distribution controls, Input and Output controls, Remediation and Restoration measures. The performance of these measures in terms of their reduction in risk of adverse impacts was assessed based on an explicit consideration of three time horizons: past, present and future. Application of the framework in an integrated management strategy evaluation of a suite of measures, shows that depending on the time horizon, different measures perform best. “Past” points to measures targeting persistent pressures (e.g. marine litter) from past activities. “Present” favors measures targeting a driver (e.g. fisheries) that has a high likelihood of causing adverse impacts. “Future” involves impacts that both have a high likelihood of an adverse impact, as well as a long time to return to pre-impacted condition after the implementation of appropriate management, e.g. those caused by permanent infrastructure or persistent pressures such as marine litter or specific types of pollution.

KW - fisheries management

KW - new-zealand

KW - vulnerability

KW - support

KW - areas

KW - south

KW - pressure

KW - context

KW - threats

KW - number

U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.03.011

DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.03.011

M3 - Article

VL - 186

SP - 158

EP - 166

JO - Biological Conservation

JF - Biological Conservation

SN - 0006-3207

ER -