Evaluation of a two-part regression calibration to adjust for dietary exposure measurement error in the Cox proportional hazards model: A simulation study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Dietary questionnaires are prone to measurement error, which bias the perceived association between dietary intake and risk of disease. Short-term measurements are required to adjust for the bias in the association. For foods that are not consumed daily, the short-term measurements are often characterized by excess zeroes. Via a simulation study, the performance of a two-part calibration model that was developed for a single-replicate study design was assessed by mimicking leafy vegetable intake reports from the multicenter European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. In part I of the fitted two-part calibration model, a logistic distribution was assumed; in part II, a gamma distribution was assumed. The model was assessed with respect to the magnitude of the correlation between the consumption probability and the consumed amount (hereafter, cross-part correlation), the number and form of covariates in the calibration model, the percentage of zero response values, and the magnitude of the measurement error in the dietary intake. From the simulation study results, transforming the dietary variable in the regression calibration to an appropriate scale was found to be the most important factor for the model performance. Reducing the number of covariates in the model could be beneficial, but was not critical in large-sample studies. The performance was remarkably robust when fitting a one-part rather than a two-part model. The model performance was minimally affected by the cross-part correlation.

LanguageEnglish
Pages766-782
JournalBiometrical Journal
Volume58
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Regression Calibration
Cox Proportional Hazards Model
Model Calibration
Proportional Hazards Models
Measurement Error
Calibration
Simulation Study
Performance Model
Covariates
Evaluation
Logistics/distribution
Nutrition
Gamma distribution
Zero
Questionnaire
Excess
Percentage
Cancer
Model
Vegetables

Keywords

  • Attenuation
  • Episodically consumed foods
  • Measurement error
  • Reference measurements
  • Regression calibration

Cite this

@article{fa0be797187147ac9cee59246b829db0,
title = "Evaluation of a two-part regression calibration to adjust for dietary exposure measurement error in the Cox proportional hazards model: A simulation study",
abstract = "Dietary questionnaires are prone to measurement error, which bias the perceived association between dietary intake and risk of disease. Short-term measurements are required to adjust for the bias in the association. For foods that are not consumed daily, the short-term measurements are often characterized by excess zeroes. Via a simulation study, the performance of a two-part calibration model that was developed for a single-replicate study design was assessed by mimicking leafy vegetable intake reports from the multicenter European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. In part I of the fitted two-part calibration model, a logistic distribution was assumed; in part II, a gamma distribution was assumed. The model was assessed with respect to the magnitude of the correlation between the consumption probability and the consumed amount (hereafter, cross-part correlation), the number and form of covariates in the calibration model, the percentage of zero response values, and the magnitude of the measurement error in the dietary intake. From the simulation study results, transforming the dietary variable in the regression calibration to an appropriate scale was found to be the most important factor for the model performance. Reducing the number of covariates in the model could be beneficial, but was not critical in large-sample studies. The performance was remarkably robust when fitting a one-part rather than a two-part model. The model performance was minimally affected by the cross-part correlation.",
keywords = "Attenuation, Episodically consumed foods, Measurement error, Reference measurements, Regression calibration",
author = "Agogo, {George O.} and {van der Voet}, Hilko and {van 't Veer}, Pieter and {van Eeuwijk}, {Fred A.} and Boshuizen, {Hendriek C.}",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1002/bimj.201500009",
language = "English",
volume = "58",
pages = "766--782",
journal = "Biometrical Journal",
issn = "0323-3847",
publisher = "Wiley-VCH Verlag",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of a two-part regression calibration to adjust for dietary exposure measurement error in the Cox proportional hazards model

T2 - Biometrical Journal

AU - Agogo, George O.

AU - van der Voet, Hilko

AU - van 't Veer, Pieter

AU - van Eeuwijk, Fred A.

AU - Boshuizen, Hendriek C.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Dietary questionnaires are prone to measurement error, which bias the perceived association between dietary intake and risk of disease. Short-term measurements are required to adjust for the bias in the association. For foods that are not consumed daily, the short-term measurements are often characterized by excess zeroes. Via a simulation study, the performance of a two-part calibration model that was developed for a single-replicate study design was assessed by mimicking leafy vegetable intake reports from the multicenter European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. In part I of the fitted two-part calibration model, a logistic distribution was assumed; in part II, a gamma distribution was assumed. The model was assessed with respect to the magnitude of the correlation between the consumption probability and the consumed amount (hereafter, cross-part correlation), the number and form of covariates in the calibration model, the percentage of zero response values, and the magnitude of the measurement error in the dietary intake. From the simulation study results, transforming the dietary variable in the regression calibration to an appropriate scale was found to be the most important factor for the model performance. Reducing the number of covariates in the model could be beneficial, but was not critical in large-sample studies. The performance was remarkably robust when fitting a one-part rather than a two-part model. The model performance was minimally affected by the cross-part correlation.

AB - Dietary questionnaires are prone to measurement error, which bias the perceived association between dietary intake and risk of disease. Short-term measurements are required to adjust for the bias in the association. For foods that are not consumed daily, the short-term measurements are often characterized by excess zeroes. Via a simulation study, the performance of a two-part calibration model that was developed for a single-replicate study design was assessed by mimicking leafy vegetable intake reports from the multicenter European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. In part I of the fitted two-part calibration model, a logistic distribution was assumed; in part II, a gamma distribution was assumed. The model was assessed with respect to the magnitude of the correlation between the consumption probability and the consumed amount (hereafter, cross-part correlation), the number and form of covariates in the calibration model, the percentage of zero response values, and the magnitude of the measurement error in the dietary intake. From the simulation study results, transforming the dietary variable in the regression calibration to an appropriate scale was found to be the most important factor for the model performance. Reducing the number of covariates in the model could be beneficial, but was not critical in large-sample studies. The performance was remarkably robust when fitting a one-part rather than a two-part model. The model performance was minimally affected by the cross-part correlation.

KW - Attenuation

KW - Episodically consumed foods

KW - Measurement error

KW - Reference measurements

KW - Regression calibration

U2 - 10.1002/bimj.201500009

DO - 10.1002/bimj.201500009

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 766

EP - 782

JO - Biometrical Journal

JF - Biometrical Journal

SN - 0323-3847

IS - 4

ER -