Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evaluation and optimization of wheat and maize national variety evaluation systems in Europe

  • Jip J.C. Ramakers*
  • , Waqas A. Malik
  • , Claude Welcker
  • , Boris Parent
  • , Daniela Bustos-Korts
  • , Nadir Abu-Samra Spencer
  • , Harimurti Buntaran
  • , Xinxin Chen
  • , Damien Eylenbosch
  • , Clemens Flamm
  • , Christophe Grizeau
  • , Juan M. Herrera
  • , Jürg Hiltbrunner
  • , Vladimíra Horáková
  • , Lilia Levy Häner
  • , Fabien Masson
  • , Joke Pannecoucque
  • , Márton Pécs
  • , Marek Povolný
  • , Philipp Starnberger
  • Margot Visse-Mansiaux, Tiziana Vonlanthen, Cécile Collonnier, François Laurens, Pierre Martre, Hans Peter Piepho, Fred A. van Eeuwijk
*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

Context and objective: To facilitate sustained productivity gains in wheat and maize across Europe, we analysed a long-term (2003–2018) European Value for Cultivation and Use (VCU) dataset to quantify genotypic (G) and genotype-by-environment interaction (GEI) variation and to assess variety-testing precision for grain yield. Methods: Mixed-model analyses were applied to partition genetic and environmental sources of yield variation across European VCU networks in seven countries and to estimate variety-comparison precision (LSDs) and annual genetic trends for both crops. Results: Across Europe, G and GEI variances were comparable, explaining in total 10–29 % of total phenotypic variance in wheat and 8–29 % in maize. LSDs ranged 0.29–0.56 t ha⁻¹ and 0.38–0.81 t ha⁻¹, respectively. Genetic trends ranged 0.45–1.81 % yr⁻¹ for wheat and 0.90–1.31 % yr⁻¹ for maize. Testing precision allowed effective comparison of wheat and maize varieties differing by 2.7–10.5 and 3.3–6.4 release years, respectively, aligning with typical breeding turnover rates. Stronger GEI was associated with larger genetic trends in maize yield, whereas in wheat, observed trends were substantially smaller than the maximum potential implied by GEI magnitudes. Combining data from national VCU networks improved precision and allowed for efficient comparison of varieties not jointly tested. Conclusions: European VCU networks are well-optimized for the number of testing locations given national evaluation periods (2–3 years). Strengthening connections among national VCU networks could further improve precision, while integrating environmental and genetic information would enable a predictive testing system, accelerating breeding progress and the development of resilient varieties. Significance: This first pan-European appraisal of current VCU testing efficiency for two major crops provides a quantitative basis for optimizing variety evaluation across Europe.

Original languageEnglish
Article number110420
Number of pages13
JournalField Crops Research
Volume341
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2026

Keywords

  • Genetic trend
  • Genotype by environment
  • Mixed Models
  • Testing efficiency
  • Value for cultivation and use

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation and optimization of wheat and maize national variety evaluation systems in Europe'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this