TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluating quality of life and response shift from a couple-based perspective
T2 - a study among patients with colorectal cancer and their partners
AU - Traa, Marjan J.
AU - Braeken, Johan
AU - De Vries, Jolanda
AU - Roukema, Jan A.
AU - Orsini, Ricardo G.
AU - Den Oudsten, Brenda L.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Objectives: To examine (1) measurement invariance of quality of life (QoL) domains over time for patients with colorectal cancer and partners (i.e., response shift—recalibration, reprioritization, and reconceptualization), (2) between dyad-member measurement invariance and (3) QoL trajectories. Methods: Participants completed the WHOQOL-Bref preoperative (Time-0) and 3 (Time-1) and 6 months (Time-2) postoperative. A stepwise procedure, using nested factor models, examined the viability of restricting specific model parameters to be equal across measurements and between dyad members. Findings: No reconceptualization and reprioritization was detected, but indications for recalibration were present. Therefore, comparisons were restricted to group-level statistics at factor level. For patients, a decrease in the Physical Health domain occurred at Time-1 (p 0.05) and were at each time point higher than patients’ factor means (p’s 0.05). Patients and partners’ factor means were comparable (p’s > 0.05). Patients and partners’ Social Relationship factor means decreased at Time-1 (p’s 0.05). Conclusion: Since both patients and partners are affected by the patients’ disease and treatment, we recommend that attention is paid to the couple instead of solely the patient.
AB - Objectives: To examine (1) measurement invariance of quality of life (QoL) domains over time for patients with colorectal cancer and partners (i.e., response shift—recalibration, reprioritization, and reconceptualization), (2) between dyad-member measurement invariance and (3) QoL trajectories. Methods: Participants completed the WHOQOL-Bref preoperative (Time-0) and 3 (Time-1) and 6 months (Time-2) postoperative. A stepwise procedure, using nested factor models, examined the viability of restricting specific model parameters to be equal across measurements and between dyad members. Findings: No reconceptualization and reprioritization was detected, but indications for recalibration were present. Therefore, comparisons were restricted to group-level statistics at factor level. For patients, a decrease in the Physical Health domain occurred at Time-1 (p 0.05) and were at each time point higher than patients’ factor means (p’s 0.05). Patients and partners’ factor means were comparable (p’s > 0.05). Patients and partners’ Social Relationship factor means decreased at Time-1 (p’s 0.05). Conclusion: Since both patients and partners are affected by the patients’ disease and treatment, we recommend that attention is paid to the couple instead of solely the patient.
KW - Colorectal cancer
KW - Dyadic
KW - Measurement invariance
KW - Partners
KW - Quality of life
KW - Response shift
U2 - 10.1007/s11136-014-0872-8
DO - 10.1007/s11136-014-0872-8
M3 - Article
C2 - 25429822
AN - SCOPUS:84930484679
SN - 0962-9343
VL - 24
SP - 1431
EP - 1441
JO - Quality of Life Research
JF - Quality of Life Research
IS - 6
ER -