TY - JOUR
T1 - Estimation of the energy cost of activities in grazing dairy cows using the oxygen pulse–heart rate method
AU - Talmón, Daniel
AU - Jasinsky, Alejandra
AU - Marin, Federica
AU - Menegazzi, Gabriel
AU - Chilibroste, Pablo
AU - Carriquiry, Mariana
PY - 2025/6
Y1 - 2025/6
N2 - Grazing dairy production systems have gained interest due to the increasing consumer preferences associated with environmental care and animal welfare perception. Nonetheless, grazing dairy cows have lower feed conversion than those fed indoors with a TMR, partly because of increased maintenance energy costs associated with grazing and walking activity. However, to our knowledge, the energy cost of grazing has not been quantified for dairy cows. The objectives of the present work were to evaluate the effects of grazing on the oxygen pulse (O2P; mL O2 consumed per heartbeat; experiment 1) and to quantify the energy cost of grazing in dairy cows using the oxygen pulse–heart rate (O2P-HR) technique (experiments 1 and 2). In both experiments, heat production (HP) was measured using the O2P-HR technique and synchronized with animal activity records. In experiment 1, 15 dairy cows were used to measure the O2P when resting and then immediately after the first grazing session to assess the effect of grazing on O2P. Grazing activity increased HR and oxygen consumption compared with when the cows were resting. However, the increase in both variables was proportional; therefore, O2P was similar, indicating that the change in HR was the main component in the response to an increased O2 demand due to grazing. Hence, it is possible to use the O2P-HR method to measure HP during grazing in dairy cows. The energy cost of grazing was estimated by the difference in HP between when the cow was grazing and when it was not grazing (i.e., idling or ruminating) and ranged from 6.63 ± 1.12 to 7.85 ± 0.68 kJ/kg0.75 per hour and 1.31 ± 0.28 to 1.59 ± 0.14 kJ/kg per hour, respectively. In addition, the energy cost of walking was calculated as the difference in HP when the cow was walking to and from the pasture and the milking parlor versus when it was idling or ruminating. The energy cost of walking was 24.03 ± 1.12 kJ/kg0.75 per hour or 4.72 ± 0.28 kJ/kg per hour. Hourly energy expenditure (kJ/h) was similar between grazing and consuming TMR at the feed bunk, indicating that the extra energy required by dairy cows when fed in a grazing system is mostly explained by the longer time spent to harvest the pasture and the energy cost of walking between the pasture and the milking parlor compared with confined cows fed TMR. Finally, the results of this study suggest that O2P is not affected by grazing and therefore that the O2P-HR technique is a promising methodology to estimate the energy cost of grazing animals without substantially affecting their behavior within the production system.
AB - Grazing dairy production systems have gained interest due to the increasing consumer preferences associated with environmental care and animal welfare perception. Nonetheless, grazing dairy cows have lower feed conversion than those fed indoors with a TMR, partly because of increased maintenance energy costs associated with grazing and walking activity. However, to our knowledge, the energy cost of grazing has not been quantified for dairy cows. The objectives of the present work were to evaluate the effects of grazing on the oxygen pulse (O2P; mL O2 consumed per heartbeat; experiment 1) and to quantify the energy cost of grazing in dairy cows using the oxygen pulse–heart rate (O2P-HR) technique (experiments 1 and 2). In both experiments, heat production (HP) was measured using the O2P-HR technique and synchronized with animal activity records. In experiment 1, 15 dairy cows were used to measure the O2P when resting and then immediately after the first grazing session to assess the effect of grazing on O2P. Grazing activity increased HR and oxygen consumption compared with when the cows were resting. However, the increase in both variables was proportional; therefore, O2P was similar, indicating that the change in HR was the main component in the response to an increased O2 demand due to grazing. Hence, it is possible to use the O2P-HR method to measure HP during grazing in dairy cows. The energy cost of grazing was estimated by the difference in HP between when the cow was grazing and when it was not grazing (i.e., idling or ruminating) and ranged from 6.63 ± 1.12 to 7.85 ± 0.68 kJ/kg0.75 per hour and 1.31 ± 0.28 to 1.59 ± 0.14 kJ/kg per hour, respectively. In addition, the energy cost of walking was calculated as the difference in HP when the cow was walking to and from the pasture and the milking parlor versus when it was idling or ruminating. The energy cost of walking was 24.03 ± 1.12 kJ/kg0.75 per hour or 4.72 ± 0.28 kJ/kg per hour. Hourly energy expenditure (kJ/h) was similar between grazing and consuming TMR at the feed bunk, indicating that the extra energy required by dairy cows when fed in a grazing system is mostly explained by the longer time spent to harvest the pasture and the energy cost of walking between the pasture and the milking parlor compared with confined cows fed TMR. Finally, the results of this study suggest that O2P is not affected by grazing and therefore that the O2P-HR technique is a promising methodology to estimate the energy cost of grazing animals without substantially affecting their behavior within the production system.
KW - energy expenditure
KW - grazing cattle
KW - indirect calorimetry
KW - maintenance energy cost
U2 - 10.3168/jds.2024-25756
DO - 10.3168/jds.2024-25756
M3 - Article
C2 - 40222679
AN - SCOPUS:105005488585
SN - 0022-0302
VL - 108
SP - 5847
EP - 5859
JO - Journal of Dairy Science
JF - Journal of Dairy Science
IS - 6
ER -