Estimating winter survival of winter wheat by simulations of plant frost tolerance

A.K. Bergjord Olsen, T. Persson, A. de Wit, L. Nkurunziza, E. Sindhøj, H. Eckersten

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Based on soil temperature, snow depth and the grown cultivar's maximum attainable level of frost tolerance (LT50c), the FROSTOL model simulates development of frost tolerance (LT50) and winter damage, thereby enabling risk calculations for winter wheat survival. To explore the accuracy of this model, four winter wheat cultivars were sown in a field experiment in Uppsala, Sweden in 2013 and 2014. The LT50 was determined by tests of frost tolerance in November, and the cultivars’ LT50c was estimated. Further, recorded winter survival from 20 winter wheat field variety trials in Sweden and Norway was collected from two winter seasons with substantial winter damages. FROSTOL simulations were run for selected cultivars at each location. According to percentage of winter damage, the cultivar survival was classified as “survived,” “intermediate” or “killed.” Mean correspondence between recorded and simulated class of winter survival was 75% and 37% for the locations in Sweden and Norway, respectively. Stress factors that were not accounted for in FROSTOL might explain the poorer accuracy at the Norwegian locations. The accuracy was poorest for cultivars with intermediate LT50c levels. When low temperature was the main cause of damage, as at the Swedish locations, the model accuracy was satisfying.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)62-73
JournalJournal of Agronomy and Crop Science
Volume204
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

frost resistance
overwintering
winter wheat
cultivars
Sweden
winter
Norway
variety trials
snow
soil temperature
temperature

Keywords

  • FROSTOL
  • LT
  • modelling
  • plant cover
  • risk assessments
  • winter damage

Cite this

Bergjord Olsen, A. K., Persson, T., de Wit, A., Nkurunziza, L., Sindhøj, E., & Eckersten, H. (2018). Estimating winter survival of winter wheat by simulations of plant frost tolerance. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 204(1), 62-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12238
Bergjord Olsen, A.K. ; Persson, T. ; de Wit, A. ; Nkurunziza, L. ; Sindhøj, E. ; Eckersten, H. / Estimating winter survival of winter wheat by simulations of plant frost tolerance. In: Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 2018 ; Vol. 204, No. 1. pp. 62-73.
@article{423761b9b9d046cfaecbacc7d0ac34a7,
title = "Estimating winter survival of winter wheat by simulations of plant frost tolerance",
abstract = "Based on soil temperature, snow depth and the grown cultivar's maximum attainable level of frost tolerance (LT50c), the FROSTOL model simulates development of frost tolerance (LT50) and winter damage, thereby enabling risk calculations for winter wheat survival. To explore the accuracy of this model, four winter wheat cultivars were sown in a field experiment in Uppsala, Sweden in 2013 and 2014. The LT50 was determined by tests of frost tolerance in November, and the cultivars’ LT50c was estimated. Further, recorded winter survival from 20 winter wheat field variety trials in Sweden and Norway was collected from two winter seasons with substantial winter damages. FROSTOL simulations were run for selected cultivars at each location. According to percentage of winter damage, the cultivar survival was classified as “survived,” “intermediate” or “killed.” Mean correspondence between recorded and simulated class of winter survival was 75{\%} and 37{\%} for the locations in Sweden and Norway, respectively. Stress factors that were not accounted for in FROSTOL might explain the poorer accuracy at the Norwegian locations. The accuracy was poorest for cultivars with intermediate LT50c levels. When low temperature was the main cause of damage, as at the Swedish locations, the model accuracy was satisfying.",
keywords = "FROSTOL, LT, modelling, plant cover, risk assessments, winter damage",
author = "{Bergjord Olsen}, A.K. and T. Persson and {de Wit}, A. and L. Nkurunziza and E. Sindh{\o}j and H. Eckersten",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jac.12238",
language = "English",
volume = "204",
pages = "62--73",
journal = "Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science",
issn = "0931-2250",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "1",

}

Bergjord Olsen, AK, Persson, T, de Wit, A, Nkurunziza, L, Sindhøj, E & Eckersten, H 2018, 'Estimating winter survival of winter wheat by simulations of plant frost tolerance', Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, vol. 204, no. 1, pp. 62-73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12238

Estimating winter survival of winter wheat by simulations of plant frost tolerance. / Bergjord Olsen, A.K.; Persson, T.; de Wit, A.; Nkurunziza, L.; Sindhøj, E.; Eckersten, H.

In: Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, Vol. 204, No. 1, 01.02.2018, p. 62-73.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimating winter survival of winter wheat by simulations of plant frost tolerance

AU - Bergjord Olsen, A.K.

AU - Persson, T.

AU - de Wit, A.

AU - Nkurunziza, L.

AU - Sindhøj, E.

AU - Eckersten, H.

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - Based on soil temperature, snow depth and the grown cultivar's maximum attainable level of frost tolerance (LT50c), the FROSTOL model simulates development of frost tolerance (LT50) and winter damage, thereby enabling risk calculations for winter wheat survival. To explore the accuracy of this model, four winter wheat cultivars were sown in a field experiment in Uppsala, Sweden in 2013 and 2014. The LT50 was determined by tests of frost tolerance in November, and the cultivars’ LT50c was estimated. Further, recorded winter survival from 20 winter wheat field variety trials in Sweden and Norway was collected from two winter seasons with substantial winter damages. FROSTOL simulations were run for selected cultivars at each location. According to percentage of winter damage, the cultivar survival was classified as “survived,” “intermediate” or “killed.” Mean correspondence between recorded and simulated class of winter survival was 75% and 37% for the locations in Sweden and Norway, respectively. Stress factors that were not accounted for in FROSTOL might explain the poorer accuracy at the Norwegian locations. The accuracy was poorest for cultivars with intermediate LT50c levels. When low temperature was the main cause of damage, as at the Swedish locations, the model accuracy was satisfying.

AB - Based on soil temperature, snow depth and the grown cultivar's maximum attainable level of frost tolerance (LT50c), the FROSTOL model simulates development of frost tolerance (LT50) and winter damage, thereby enabling risk calculations for winter wheat survival. To explore the accuracy of this model, four winter wheat cultivars were sown in a field experiment in Uppsala, Sweden in 2013 and 2014. The LT50 was determined by tests of frost tolerance in November, and the cultivars’ LT50c was estimated. Further, recorded winter survival from 20 winter wheat field variety trials in Sweden and Norway was collected from two winter seasons with substantial winter damages. FROSTOL simulations were run for selected cultivars at each location. According to percentage of winter damage, the cultivar survival was classified as “survived,” “intermediate” or “killed.” Mean correspondence between recorded and simulated class of winter survival was 75% and 37% for the locations in Sweden and Norway, respectively. Stress factors that were not accounted for in FROSTOL might explain the poorer accuracy at the Norwegian locations. The accuracy was poorest for cultivars with intermediate LT50c levels. When low temperature was the main cause of damage, as at the Swedish locations, the model accuracy was satisfying.

KW - FROSTOL

KW - LT

KW - modelling

KW - plant cover

KW - risk assessments

KW - winter damage

U2 - 10.1111/jac.12238

DO - 10.1111/jac.12238

M3 - Article

VL - 204

SP - 62

EP - 73

JO - Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

JF - Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

SN - 0931-2250

IS - 1

ER -