Errors in science: the role of reviewers

T. Szekely, O. Kruger, E.T. Krause

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialAcademicpeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Reviewers play a key role in science, although studies suggest the current peer-reviewing system has faults. We propose to introduce a quality control system to evaluate each journal’s review process, and produce a Review Quality Index. We propose four schemes that have the potential to reduce errors in a key step in scientific decision making: the reviewing process.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)371-373
JournalTrends in Ecology and Evolution
Volume29
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Errors in science: the role of reviewers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this