Abstract
Traditional grazing grounds near Amboseli National Park (Kenya) are being rapidly converted to cropland ¿ a process that closes important wildlife corridors. We use a spatially explicit simulation model that integrates ecosystem dynamics and pastoral decision-making to explore the scope for introducing a `payments for ecosystem services¿ scheme to compensate pastoralists for spillover benefits associated with forms of land use that are compatible with wildlife conservation. Our break-even cost analysis suggests that the benefits of such a scheme likely exceed its costs for a large part of the study area, but that `leakage effects¿ through excessive stocking rates warrant close scrutiny.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 395-414 |
| Journal | Environment and Development Economics |
| Volume | 13 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2008 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 15 Life on Land
Keywords
- biodiversity conservation
- integrated conservation
- development-projects
- management
- africa
- determinants
- subdivision
- rangelands
- livestock
- savanna
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Elephants or Onions? Paying for Nature in Amboseli, Kenya'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver