Efficiency changes in bottom trawling for flatfish species as a result of the replacement of mechanical stimulation by electric stimulation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although fishing with electricity is illegal in the European Union, a number of temporary licences allowed converting beam trawlers to pulse trawling. To analyse how the adaption of pulse trawling changed this fishery, we studied fishing speeds and landings per unit effort as proxies for catch efficiencies for the main target species. Compared to conventional tickler chain beam trawls, pulse trawls were towed at lower speeds (small vessels -10%, large vessels -23%). Large vessels that switched from conventional beam trawls to pulse trawls at the end of 2009 gradually increased catch efficiency for sole over the period of almost 1 year. While pulse trawling was found to have higher catch rates (kg/h) for sole (small vessels +74%, large vessels +17%), lower catch rates were observed for plaice (small vessels -31%, large vessels -32%). Vessels that switched later achieved immediate gains in catch efficiency for sole. The change in catch efficiency is likely due to the difference in cramp response between the species.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2635-2645
Number of pages11
JournalICES Journal of Marine Science
Volume77
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2020

Keywords

  • beam trawling
  • ecosystem effects of trawling
  • environmental impact
  • fisheries management
  • North Sea
  • plaice
  • pulse trawling
  • sole
  • species selectivity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficiency changes in bottom trawling for flatfish species as a result of the replacement of mechanical stimulation by electric stimulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this