Effects of non-nutritive (artificial vs natural) sweeteners on 24-h glucose profiles

S.L. Tey, N.B. Salleh, C.J. Henry, C.G. Forde*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

Abstract

Replacing nutritive sweetener with non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) has the potential to improve glycaemic control. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of consuming artificial NNS (that is, aspartame), natural NNS (that is, monk fruit and stevia), and sucrose-sweetened beverages on 24-h glucose profiles. Ten healthy males took part in this randomised, crossover study with the following four treatments: aspartame-, monk fruit-, stevia-, and sucrose- (65 g) sweetened beverages. Participants were asked to consume the test beverage as a preload mid-morning. Medtronic iPro2 continuous glucose monitoring system was used to measure mean 24-h glucose, incremental area under the curve (iAUC) and total area under the curve (AUC) for glucose, and 24-h glycaemic variability. Overall no significant differences were found in mean 24-h glucose, iAUC and total AUC for glucose, and 24-h glycaemic variability between the four test beverages. Twenty-four-hour glucose profiles did not differ between beverages sweetened with non-nutritive (artificial vs natural) and nutritive sweeteners. The simple exchange of a single serving of sucrose-sweetened beverage with NNS over a day appears to have minimal effect on 24-h glucose profiles in healthy males.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1129-1132
Number of pages4
JournalEuropean Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Volume71
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Apr 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of non-nutritive (artificial vs natural) sweeteners on 24-h glucose profiles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this