Effects of competition on root-shoot allocation in Plantago lanceolata L.: adaptive plasticity or ontogenetic drift?

F. Berendse, F. Möller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleAcademicpeer-review

53 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We investigated how shoot and root allocation in plants responds to increasing levels of competitive stress at different levels of soil fertility. In addition, we analyzed whether different responses were due to adaptive plasticity or should be attributed to ontogenetic drift. Plantago lanceolata plants were grown during 18 weeks at five plant densities and four nutrient supply levels in pots in the greenhouse. Thereafter root and shoot biomass was measured. There were clear negative effects of increasing plant densities on plant weights revealing strong intraspecific competition. At the lower N-treatments, the proportional allocation to root mass increased with increasing competitive stress, indicating the important role of belowground competition. At the higher N-supply rate, the relationship between competitive stress and shoot to root ratio was neutral. These responses could not be attributed to ontogenetic drift, but could only be explained by assuming adaptive plasticity. It was concluded that at lower N-supplies belowground competition dominates and leads to increased allocation to roots, while at the higher N-supply competition for soil resources and light had balanced impacts on shoot and root allocation. An alternative hypothesis explaining the observed pattern is that light competition has far less pronounced impacts on root¿shoot allocation than nutrient deprival.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)567-573
JournalPlant Ecology
Volume201
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009

Keywords

  • below-ground competition
  • biomass allocation
  • nutrients
  • intensity
  • grassland
  • gradient

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of competition on root-shoot allocation in Plantago lanceolata L.: adaptive plasticity or ontogenetic drift?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this