Abstract
In this study, the effects of artificial boar stimuli on oestrus expression in sows were compared to that of a boar.
During consecutive cycles, 12 gilts and 38 sows were subjected to one of the three treatments. A Back-Pressure-Test (BPT) was carried out twice daily in the presence of a robot boar (R) with: (1) olfactory and auditory stimuli (R + O + A), (2) auditory stimuli (R + A) or (3) without additional stimuli (R). As a reference, a BPT was carried out in the presence of a mature boar 30 min after the robot procedure.
With the boar, detection rate was higher (100% versus 66% (R + O + A), 81% (R + A), and 75% (R); P <0.01) and the duration of oestrus was longer (56 ± 7 h versus 33 ± 4 h (R + O + A), 54 ± 5 h versus 36 ± 5 h (R + A), and 60 ± 3 h versus 38 ± 3 h (R); P <0.01) than with any combination of artificial boar stimuli. The different combinations of artificial stimuli did not differ in detection rate and duration of oestrus (P > 0.10). Artificial, olfactory and auditory stimuli did not add to the visual stimuli.
Furthermore, the presence of a boar results in better oestrus expression than a combination of all artificial stimuli.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 37-43 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Applied Animal Behaviour Science |
| Volume | 92 |
| Issue number | 1-2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2005 |
Keywords
- androgen steroids
- aid
- insemination
- behavior
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of artificial boar stimuli on the expression of oestrus in sows'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver