Abstract
Agri-environment management (AEM) started in the 1980s in Europe to mitigate biodiversity decline, but the effectiveness of AEM has been questioned. We hypothesize that this is caused by a lack of a large enough ecological contrast between AEM and non-treated control sites. The effectiveness of AEM may be moderated by landscape structure and land-use intensity. Here, we examined the influence of local ecological contrast, landscape structure and regional land-use intensity on AEM effectiveness in a meta-analysis of 62 European pollinator studies. We found that ecological contrast was most important in determining the effectiveness of AEM, but landscape structure and regional land-use intensity played also a role. In conclusion, the most successful way to enhance AEM effectiveness for pollinators is to implement measures that result in a large ecological improvement at a local scale, which exhibit a strong contrast to conventional practices in simple landscapes of intensive land-use regions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1493-1500 |
Journal | Ecology Letters |
Volume | 22 |
Issue number | 9 |
Early online date | 8 Jul 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sep 2019 |
Keywords
- Agri-environmental schemes
- bees
- biodiversity
- butterflies
- ecosystem services
- flower strips
- hoverflies
- land-use intensity
- meta-analysis